Comparative Analysis of Anion Exchange Membrane Adsorbers for Endotoxin Removal During Ultrafiltration and Diafiltration Buffer Preparation

During the manufacturing of drug substances (DS), endotoxins are a commonly monitored contaminant and checked to ensure the safety and quality of the final product. In this study, we investigated endotoxin removal by commercial anion exchange membrane adsorbers during buffer preparation for an ultrafiltration and diafiltration (UFDF) unit operation as a risk mitigation strategy to meet DS endotoxin specifications. A bracketing design study was used to compare two quaternary amine (Q) modified membranes and one guanidinium functionalized hybrid adsorber for endotoxin removal from spiked buffers representing UFDF start and diafiltration buffer matrices. For the UFDF start buffer, Q-based membrane adsorbers were effective at the removal of endotoxin to the limit of detection in low ionic strength conditions, with one adsorber effective up to 24 mS/cm. Switching to a more complex UFDF diafiltration buffer, Q-based membrane adsorbers were impacted by additional buffer components. The guanidinium-based hybrid membrane adsorber demonstrated endotoxin reduction to the limit of detection from both buffer matrices, showing removal across a wide pH range (4.7-8.3) and conductivity as high as 43 mS/cm. These results demonstrate an operational window for buffers and selected membrane adsorbers to mitigate risk by limiting endotoxin contamination prior to UFDF operations in pharmaceutical applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering in Life Sciences
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.70029
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Anion Exchange Membrane Adsorbers for Endotoxin Removal During Ultrafiltration and Diafiltration Buffer Preparation

Alexander Faude, Sven Heimann, Andrew Vail, Sophie Muczenski
1 citations
Engineering in Life Sciences
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
1.52
article

Comparative Analysis of Anion Exchange Membrane Adsorbers for Endotoxin Removal During Ultrafiltration and Diafiltration Buffer Preparation

Alexander Faude, Sven Heimann, Andrew Vail, Sophie Muczenski
article en
1 citations

Abstract

During the manufacturing of drug substances (DS), endotoxins are a commonly monitored contaminant and checked to ensure the safety and quality of the final product. In this study, we investigated endotoxin removal by commercial anion exchange membrane adsorbers during buffer preparation for an ultrafiltration and diafiltration (UFDF) unit operation as a risk mitigation strategy to meet DS endotoxin specifications. A bracketing design study was used to compare two quaternary amine (Q) modified membranes and one guanidinium functionalized hybrid adsorber for endotoxin removal from spiked buffers representing UFDF start and diafiltration buffer matrices. For the UFDF start buffer, Q-based membrane adsorbers were effective at the removal of endotoxin to the limit of detection in low ionic strength conditions, with one adsorber effective up to 24 mS/cm. Switching to a more complex UFDF diafiltration buffer, Q-based membrane adsorbers were impacted by additional buffer components. The guanidinium-based hybrid membrane adsorber demonstrated endotoxin reduction to the limit of detection from both buffer matrices, showing removal across a wide pH range (4.7-8.3) and conductivity as high as 43 mS/cm. These results demonstrate an operational window for buffers and selected membrane adsorbers to mitigate risk by limiting endotoxin contamination prior to UFDF operations in pharmaceutical applications.

Engineering in Life SciencesVol. 25(7)
Rentschler Biopharma (Germany) (DE)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.