Legal analysis of the provisions prohibiting marriage between female soldiers and male soldiers of lower rank in gender equality

Purpose: This study analyzes the provisions prohibiting marriage for female soldiers with male soldiers of lower rank in the context of gender equality and human rights. Research methodology: The regulation is contained in Perpang No. 50 of 2014 and several other technical instructions in the TNI environment, a comparison with flexible Polri regulations that prioritize the principle of justice without discrimination. Results: Through a normative legal approach, this study found that this prohibition is contrary to various national and international legal instruments, such as the 1945 Constitution, Compilation of Islamic Law, Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights, UDHR, ICCPR and CEDAW. The prohibition not only creates injustice but also affects the morale and welfare of soldiers.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Justice and Humanity
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35912/ajh.v3i2.2871
Primary Topic
International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal analysis of the provisions prohibiting marriage between female soldiers and male soldiers of lower rank in gender equality

Harjoko Simbolon
Annals of Justice and Humanity
International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
article

Legal analysis of the provisions prohibiting marriage between female soldiers and male soldiers of lower rank in gender equality

Harjoko Simbolon
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This study analyzes the provisions prohibiting marriage for female soldiers with male soldiers of lower rank in the context of gender equality and human rights. Research methodology: The regulation is contained in Perpang No. 50 of 2014 and several other technical instructions in the TNI environment, a comparison with flexible Polri regulations that prioritize the principle of justice without discrimination. Results: Through a normative legal approach, this study found that this prohibition is contrary to various national and international legal instruments, such as the 1945 Constitution, Compilation of Islamic Law, Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights, UDHR, ICCPR and CEDAW. The prohibition not only creates injustice but also affects the morale and welfare of soldiers.

Annals of Justice and HumanityVol. 3(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Legal analysis of the provisions prohibiting marriage between female soldiers and male soldiers of lower rank in gender equality — Harjoko Simbolon · Annals of Justice and Humanity (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS