Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Reduces Superficial Surgical Site Infection Risk of Emergency Surgery Patients: Results of a Multicenter Randomised Prospective Clinical Trial

Despite modern aseptic precautions, surgical site infection remains a significant problem. Although the benefits of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of chronic wounds are well established, high-level evidence is still lacking on the potential role of negative pressure in the prevention of surgical site infections. We conducted a multicenter, randomised, prospective trial of closed incision vacuum therapy. A total of 90 general surgery patients undergoing emergency laparotomy were enrolled and randomised, 45 cases in the treatment group and 45 cases in the control group. Our aim was to show a significant difference in the rate of surgical site infection between the two groups. In the study group, laparotomy wounds were treated with a single 5-day course of prophylactic vacuum therapy, whereas the control group underwent conventional postoperative wound management with sterile gauze dressings. Ten of the 45 patients in the study group developed a surgical site infection compared to 20 of 45 in the control group (22.2% vs. 44.4% p = 0.025). Upon further analysis, the proportion of superficial SSIs was found to be significantly lower in the ciNPWT group (40% vs. 20% p = 0.038), whereas the difference in deep SSI rates was not statistically significant (4.4% vs. 4.4% p = 1.0). In conclusion, negative pressure wound therapy is not only an effective way to heal chronic wounds, but it's prophylactic use may reduce the overall rate of surgical site infections. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03716687.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Wound Journal
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.70718
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Surgical site infection prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Reduces Superficial Surgical Site Infection Risk of Emergency Surgery Patients: Results of a Multicenter Randomised Prospective Clinical Trial

László Venczel, András Fülöp, Zsolt Káposztás, V. Szendrényi et al.
3 citations
International Wound Journal
Surgical site infection prevention
6.02
article

Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Reduces Superficial Surgical Site Infection Risk of Emergency Surgery Patients: Results of a Multicenter Randomised Prospective Clinical Trial

László Venczel, András Fülöp, Zsolt Káposztás, V. Szendrényi, György Lázár, Bence Kecskédi, László Libor, Attila Bursics, Krisztina Varga, Attila Szíjártó, Balázs Bánky, Balázs Mohos, László Sikorszki, Zoltán Lóderer, József Marton, András Herczeg, Ervin Máthé, Balázs Páncél
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Despite modern aseptic precautions, surgical site infection remains a significant problem. Although the benefits of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of chronic wounds are well established, high-level evidence is still lacking on the potential role of negative pressure in the prevention of surgical site infections. We conducted a multicenter, randomised, prospective trial of closed incision vacuum therapy. A total of 90 general surgery patients undergoing emergency laparotomy were enrolled and randomised, 45 cases in the treatment group and 45 cases in the control group. Our aim was to show a significant difference in the rate of surgical site infection between the two groups. In the study group, laparotomy wounds were treated with a single 5-day course of prophylactic vacuum therapy, whereas the control group underwent conventional postoperative wound management with sterile gauze dressings. Ten of the 45 patients in the study group developed a surgical site infection compared to 20 of 45 in the control group (22.2% vs. 44.4% p = 0.025). Upon further analysis, the proportion of superficial SSIs was found to be significantly lower in the ciNPWT group (40% vs. 20% p = 0.038), whereas the difference in deep SSI rates was not statistically significant (4.4% vs. 4.4% p = 1.0). In conclusion, negative pressure wound therapy is not only an effective way to heal chronic wounds, but it's prophylactic use may reduce the overall rate of surgical site infections. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03716687.

International Wound JournalVol. 22(7)
Semmelweis University (HU), University of Szeged (HU), Somogy Megyei Kaposi Mór Oktató Kórház (HU), Szent Borbála Kórház (HU), Bács-Kiskun Megyei Kórház (HU), Uzsoki Hospital (HU), Markusovszky Egyetemi Oktatókórház (HU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Surgical site infection prevention
6.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.