PERFORMANCE LOSS QUANTIFICATION IN KERNEL DENSITY ESTIMATION FOR ACTUARIAL AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

Accurately estimating aggregate loss distributions is critical in actuarial and financial risk assessment, as it underpins effective risk analysis and the development of mitigation strategies. However, incorrect parametric assumptions can lead to biased risk estimates and underestimated losses. Non-parametric methods, such as Kernel Density Estimation (KDE), offer a flexible alternative by generating smooth empirical probability density functions (PDFs) directly from sample data without assuming a specific distributional form. This study examines the impact of dependence structures on risk measures by applying KDE with a Gaussian kernel to estimate aggregate loss distributions. To quantify the effects of ignoring dependence, we introduce the concept of performance loss, focusing on variance, Value at Risk (VaR), and Tail Value at Risk (TVaR). The results show that performance loss increases with the correlation coefficient, indicating that higher dependency leads to greater underestimation of risk. Additionally, higher confidence levels amplify performance loss for VaR and TVaR, underscoring the sensitivity of these measures to tail behavior. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating dependence structures in risk modeling to avoid misleading evaluations. The implications are particularly relevant for disaster risk management in Central Asia, where overlooking interdependencies in seismic losses could result in inadequate financial and actuarial strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BAREKENG JURNAL ILMU MATEMATIKA DAN TERAPAN
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30598/barekengvol19iss3pp2029-2038
Primary Topic
Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PERFORMANCE LOSS QUANTIFICATION IN KERNEL DENSITY ESTIMATION FOR ACTUARIAL AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

Nanang Susyanto, Dwi Ertiningsih, Shafira Fauzia Untsa, Danang Teguh Qoiyyimi
BAREKENG JURNAL ILMU MATEMATIKA DAN TERAPAN
Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
article

PERFORMANCE LOSS QUANTIFICATION IN KERNEL DENSITY ESTIMATION FOR ACTUARIAL AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

Nanang Susyanto, Dwi Ertiningsih, Shafira Fauzia Untsa, Danang Teguh Qoiyyimi
article en

Abstract

Accurately estimating aggregate loss distributions is critical in actuarial and financial risk assessment, as it underpins effective risk analysis and the development of mitigation strategies. However, incorrect parametric assumptions can lead to biased risk estimates and underestimated losses. Non-parametric methods, such as Kernel Density Estimation (KDE), offer a flexible alternative by generating smooth empirical probability density functions (PDFs) directly from sample data without assuming a specific distributional form. This study examines the impact of dependence structures on risk measures by applying KDE with a Gaussian kernel to estimate aggregate loss distributions. To quantify the effects of ignoring dependence, we introduce the concept of performance loss, focusing on variance, Value at Risk (VaR), and Tail Value at Risk (TVaR). The results show that performance loss increases with the correlation coefficient, indicating that higher dependency leads to greater underestimation of risk. Additionally, higher confidence levels amplify performance loss for VaR and TVaR, underscoring the sensitivity of these measures to tail behavior. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating dependence structures in risk modeling to avoid misleading evaluations. The implications are particularly relevant for disaster risk management in Central Asia, where overlooking interdependencies in seismic losses could result in inadequate financial and actuarial strategies.

BAREKENG JURNAL ILMU MATEMATIKA DAN TERAPANVol. 19(3)
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.