COMPARISON BETWEEN BAYESIAN QUANTILE REGRESSION AND BAYESIAN LASSO QUANTILE REGRESSION FOR MODELING POVERTY LINE WITH PRESENCE OF HETEROSCEDASTICITY IN WEST SUMATRA

The poverty line is the threshold income level below which a person or household is considered to be living in poverty. The poverty line is a representation of the minimum rupiah amount needed to meet the minimum basic food needs equivalent to 2100 kilocalories per capita per day and basic non-food needs. According to data from the Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS), although the poverty rate in West Sumatra has decreased in recent years, the issue of poverty is still very relevant to be discussed and addressed. The issue of the poverty line is important to discuss because it is directly related to the welfare of people and the development of a country. For modeling the poverty line and its influencing factors, appropriate statistical methods are needed. This research is about the comparison of two methods, namely the Bayesian quantile regression method and Bayesian LASSO quantile regression. The two methods are compared with the aim of seeing which method produces the smallest error. Bayesian quantile regression is one method that can model data assuming heteroscedasticity violations. This study compares the ordinary Bayesian quantile regression method with penalized LASSO. These two methods are applied in modeling the poverty line in West Sumatra. The purpose of this study is to see the best method for modeling data. The data used amounted to 133 data points from BPS in the years 2017 and 2023. Model parameters were estimated using MCMC with a Gibbs sampling approach. The results show that the Bayesian LASSO method is superior to the method without LASSO. This is evidenced that the superior method produces the smallest MSE value, 0.208, at quantile 0.5. Model poverty line in West Sumatra is significantly influenced by per capita spending ), Gross Regional Domestic Product ), Human Development Index ), Open Unemployment Rate , and minimum wages .