Combining soil conservation with phosphorus drawdown can confront legacy phosphorus accumulation and transfer

Legacy phosphorus (P) in agricultural soils (i.e., P that derives from historical human activities) can resist conventional nutrient management strategies to improve water quality (e.g., placement, rate, source, and timing of application). Further, soil conservation practices such as reduced tillage, while potentially beneficial for improving soil health and minimizing erosion, can promote dissolved P loss. Comprehensive legacy P management requires targeted mitigation strategies that consider the sources and processes involved in P mobilization and transport. We modeled trade-offs and interactions of nutrient management and soil conservation strategies in legacy P mitigation efforts at three key sites in the northern United States where legacy P contributions to water quality are a concern. The Annual Phosphorus Loss Estimator (APLE) model was used to simulate generalized management scenarios at each site: current site-specific practices, conventional conservation practices (no-till and manure injection), and P drawdown (curtailing fertilizer P additions and extracting P from soils via crop uptake and harvest). Modeled results highlight that the effects of legacy P are not always obvious; even at sites near the range of agronomic optimum, losses of legacy P in runoff can be significant. Phosphorus drawdown via crop uptake and removal offers the potential to deplete legacy P stores but requires dedication and time. In model simulations, no-till reduced total P losses due to reductions in sediment transport. Coupling drawdown strategies with appropriate conservation management to avoid inadvertent P losses can reduce both dissolved and particulate P losses. Focusing on either soil conservation or soil P drawdown alone is insufficient to meet water quality goals. Phosphorus drawdown strategies must be accompanied by practices supporting soil conservation to ensure that legacy P management benefits water quality in the short and long term.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00224561.2025.2492525
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combining soil conservation with phosphorus drawdown can confront legacy phosphorus accumulation and transfer

Zachary Simpson, Joshua Mott, Kevin W. King, Grace L. Miner et al.
3 citations
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
2.58
article

Combining soil conservation with phosphorus drawdown can confront legacy phosphorus accumulation and transfer

Zachary Simpson, Joshua Mott, Kevin W. King, Grace L. Miner, Christine L. Dolph, Gary W. Feyereisen, Joshua Faulkner, Lisa F. Duriancik, William R. Osterholz, Mark R. Williams, Carl H. Bolster, Peter J. A. Kleinman, B. J. Dalzell
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Legacy phosphorus (P) in agricultural soils (i.e., P that derives from historical human activities) can resist conventional nutrient management strategies to improve water quality (e.g., placement, rate, source, and timing of application). Further, soil conservation practices such as reduced tillage, while potentially beneficial for improving soil health and minimizing erosion, can promote dissolved P loss. Comprehensive legacy P management requires targeted mitigation strategies that consider the sources and processes involved in P mobilization and transport. We modeled trade-offs and interactions of nutrient management and soil conservation strategies in legacy P mitigation efforts at three key sites in the northern United States where legacy P contributions to water quality are a concern. The Annual Phosphorus Loss Estimator (APLE) model was used to simulate generalized management scenarios at each site: current site-specific practices, conventional conservation practices (no-till and manure injection), and P drawdown (curtailing fertilizer P additions and extracting P from soils via crop uptake and harvest). Modeled results highlight that the effects of legacy P are not always obvious; even at sites near the range of agronomic optimum, losses of legacy P in runoff can be significant. Phosphorus drawdown via crop uptake and removal offers the potential to deplete legacy P stores but requires dedication and time. In model simulations, no-till reduced total P losses due to reductions in sediment transport. Coupling drawdown strategies with appropriate conservation management to avoid inadvertent P losses can reduce both dissolved and particulate P losses. Focusing on either soil conservation or soil P drawdown alone is insufficient to meet water quality goals. Phosphorus drawdown strategies must be accompanied by practices supporting soil conservation to ensure that legacy P management benefits water quality in the short and long term.

Journal of Soil and Water ConservationVol. 80(3)
University of Vermont (US), Natural Resources Conservation Service (US), University of Minnesota (US), Agricultural Research Service (US), National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
2.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.