Instructors vs. Learners’ Insights On ChatGPT Use in EFL Settings: Beneficial or Unfavorable?

The application of ChatGPT, an AI-driven tool launched in 2022, has sparked debate in the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) setting since its emergence, with some questioning its effectiveness and others favoring its use. This study aimed to explore the insights of how students and instructors perceive ChatGPT in the EFL context. Using a descriptive qualitative method, 34 participants comprising 17 EFL students and 17 EFL instructors provided their insights through Likert-scale questionnaires. Thematic Analysis was used to examine the data. Results revealed mixed perspectives: the majority of both students (52.9%) and instructors (52.9%) agreed that ChatGPT positively contributes to English skill improvement. Similarly, most participants (58.8% students, and 64.7%) believed it provides a good learning experience. In terms of class participation, 35.3% of students and 47.1% of instructors considered ChatGPT effective. However, opinions on its user-friendliness were divided among students (35.3% disagreed, 29.4% agreed), while a majority of instructors (58.8%) found it not easy to use. Both groups (students: 50.8%, instructors: 53.9%) disagreed that ChatGPT enhances critical thinking, possibly due to its automation feature. Regarding future use, 35.3% of students and 41.2% of instructors expressed a positive outlook. In conclusion, ChatGPT is viewed favorably overall in the aspects measured, indicating its potential for use in EFL settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of International Conference on Education
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32672/pice.v3i1.3443
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Instructors vs. Learners’ Insights On ChatGPT Use in EFL Settings: Beneficial or Unfavorable?

Cut Mulia Zuhra, Sabrina Sabrina
Proceedings of International Conference on Education
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Instructors vs. Learners’ Insights On ChatGPT Use in EFL Settings: Beneficial or Unfavorable?

Cut Mulia Zuhra, Sabrina Sabrina
article en

Abstract

The application of ChatGPT, an AI-driven tool launched in 2022, has sparked debate in the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) setting since its emergence, with some questioning its effectiveness and others favoring its use. This study aimed to explore the insights of how students and instructors perceive ChatGPT in the EFL context. Using a descriptive qualitative method, 34 participants comprising 17 EFL students and 17 EFL instructors provided their insights through Likert-scale questionnaires. Thematic Analysis was used to examine the data. Results revealed mixed perspectives: the majority of both students (52.9%) and instructors (52.9%) agreed that ChatGPT positively contributes to English skill improvement. Similarly, most participants (58.8% students, and 64.7%) believed it provides a good learning experience. In terms of class participation, 35.3% of students and 47.1% of instructors considered ChatGPT effective. However, opinions on its user-friendliness were divided among students (35.3% disagreed, 29.4% agreed), while a majority of instructors (58.8%) found it not easy to use. Both groups (students: 50.8%, instructors: 53.9%) disagreed that ChatGPT enhances critical thinking, possibly due to its automation feature. Regarding future use, 35.3% of students and 41.2% of instructors expressed a positive outlook. In conclusion, ChatGPT is viewed favorably overall in the aspects measured, indicating its potential for use in EFL settings.

Proceedings of International Conference on EducationVol. 3(1)
Universitas Serambi Mekkah (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.