A Global Regionalisation of Tree Functional Capacity

ABSTRACT Aim Understanding the global distribution of tree functional diversity is essential for predicting ecosystem responses to environmental change. Traditional biogeographic regionalisations classify ecosystems based on species composition and climate but overlook functional traits, which directly govern processes such as carbon storage, nutrient cycling and productivity. Here, we present the first global functional regionalisation of tree‐inhabited systems into functionally distinct regions based on tree traits rather than taxonomic or climatic boundaries. Location Global, covering forests, savannas and grasslands. Time Period Present. Major Taxa Studied Trees. Methods We compiled over 5 million tree species occurrences and associated functional traits related to photosynthesis, growth, reproduction, structure and physiology. Using a stability‐based clustering approach, we identified functional macro‐regions (85% variance explained), meso‐regions (90%) and micro‐regions (99%). We also identified important traits discriminating these regions and assessed the relative influence of climate and phylogeny in shaping these functional boundaries. Results We identified five major functional macro‐regions: Boreal, Cool Temperate, Warm Temperate, Neotropical and Paleotropical. Boreal and temperate macro‐regions align closely with climatic zones, while tropical macro‐regions are structured primarily by evolutionary history rather than moisture availability. Functional differentiation is driven by photosynthetic and reproductive traits across scales, with structural, growth and physiological traits dominating at macro, meso and micro levels, respectively. Phylogenetic distance explains 68% of the functional divergence between Neotropical and Paleotropical macro‐regions, whereas environmental differences drive 42%–44% of the variance between tropical and temperate regions. Main Conclusions Our study provides one of the first global functional classifications of tree‐inhabited ecosystems, revealing that climate primarily structures temperate and boreal regions, while evolutionary history drives tropical functional diversity. These findings offer a new perspective on global biogeography and ecosystem resilience, with implications for biodiversity conservation and climate adaptation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70083
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Global Regionalisation of Tree Functional Capacity

Lalasia Bialic‐Murphy, Andrea Paz, Daniel S. Maynard, Thomas Ward Crowther et al.
2 citations
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
2.21
article

A Global Regionalisation of Tree Functional Capacity

Lalasia Bialic‐Murphy, Andrea Paz, Daniel S. Maynard, Thomas Ward Crowther, Yohana G. Jiménez
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim Understanding the global distribution of tree functional diversity is essential for predicting ecosystem responses to environmental change. Traditional biogeographic regionalisations classify ecosystems based on species composition and climate but overlook functional traits, which directly govern processes such as carbon storage, nutrient cycling and productivity. Here, we present the first global functional regionalisation of tree‐inhabited systems into functionally distinct regions based on tree traits rather than taxonomic or climatic boundaries. Location Global, covering forests, savannas and grasslands. Time Period Present. Major Taxa Studied Trees. Methods We compiled over 5 million tree species occurrences and associated functional traits related to photosynthesis, growth, reproduction, structure and physiology. Using a stability‐based clustering approach, we identified functional macro‐regions (85% variance explained), meso‐regions (90%) and micro‐regions (99%). We also identified important traits discriminating these regions and assessed the relative influence of climate and phylogeny in shaping these functional boundaries. Results We identified five major functional macro‐regions: Boreal, Cool Temperate, Warm Temperate, Neotropical and Paleotropical. Boreal and temperate macro‐regions align closely with climatic zones, while tropical macro‐regions are structured primarily by evolutionary history rather than moisture availability. Functional differentiation is driven by photosynthetic and reproductive traits across scales, with structural, growth and physiological traits dominating at macro, meso and micro levels, respectively. Phylogenetic distance explains 68% of the functional divergence between Neotropical and Paleotropical macro‐regions, whereas environmental differences drive 42%–44% of the variance between tropical and temperate regions. Main Conclusions Our study provides one of the first global functional classifications of tree‐inhabited ecosystems, revealing that climate primarily structures temperate and boreal regions, while evolutionary history drives tropical functional diversity. These findings offer a new perspective on global biogeography and ecosystem resilience, with implications for biodiversity conservation and climate adaptation strategies.

Global Ecology and BiogeographyVol. 34(7)
National University of Tucumán (AR), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), ETH Zurich (CH), University College London (GB), Université de Montréal (CA)
National Science Foundation, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.