Quantitative evaluation of metal artifact reduction in CBCT under varying exposure modes and rod orientations

This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy of a metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) under varying exposure modes and metal rod orientations using a standardized evaluation method. A SEDENTEXCT IQ phantom was scanned with a CBCT system under three exposure modes (standard, low-dose, ultra-low-dose) and two rod orientations (horizontal, vertical), with the MAR algorithm activated and deactivated. Artifact areas were quantified from binarized images based on a thresholding method that distinguished artifact-affected regions from the background. The percentage reduction in metal artifacts was calculated by comparing scans acquired with and without MAR activation. Statistical analyses were conducted to assess differences across conditions. The MAR algorithm significantly reduced metal artifacts under all tested conditions (P < 0.05), with reductions of 61.5% in the standard mode, 73.6% in the low-dose mode, and 80.3% in the ultra-low-dose mode. By rod orientation, artifact reduction was 63.3% for the horizontal orientation and 80.7% for the vertical orientation. These results confirm the consistent effectiveness of the MAR algorithm across different acquisition settings. The proposed standardized evaluation method provides a reproducible framework for objectively assessing MAR performance and supporting its clinical integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-08188-8
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative evaluation of metal artifact reduction in CBCT under varying exposure modes and rod orientations

Sang‐Sun Han, Kug Jin Jeon, Chul-Wan Park, Gahyung Jo
3 citations
Scientific Reports
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
2.02
article

Quantitative evaluation of metal artifact reduction in CBCT under varying exposure modes and rod orientations

Sang‐Sun Han, Kug Jin Jeon, Chul-Wan Park, Gahyung Jo
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy of a metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) under varying exposure modes and metal rod orientations using a standardized evaluation method. A SEDENTEXCT IQ phantom was scanned with a CBCT system under three exposure modes (standard, low-dose, ultra-low-dose) and two rod orientations (horizontal, vertical), with the MAR algorithm activated and deactivated. Artifact areas were quantified from binarized images based on a thresholding method that distinguished artifact-affected regions from the background. The percentage reduction in metal artifacts was calculated by comparing scans acquired with and without MAR activation. Statistical analyses were conducted to assess differences across conditions. The MAR algorithm significantly reduced metal artifacts under all tested conditions (P < 0.05), with reductions of 61.5% in the standard mode, 73.6% in the low-dose mode, and 80.3% in the ultra-low-dose mode. By rod orientation, artifact reduction was 63.3% for the horizontal orientation and 80.7% for the vertical orientation. These results confirm the consistent effectiveness of the MAR algorithm across different acquisition settings. The proposed standardized evaluation method provides a reproducible framework for objectively assessing MAR performance and supporting its clinical integration.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Yonsei University (KR), Yonsei University College of Dentistry
National Research Foundation, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.