Digital Participation at Criminal Trials in Europe – Toward a Paradigm Shift?

Abstract The digitalization of criminal trials in Europe represents a transformative shift from traditional, physical courtroom settings to virtual participation. This transition, though driven by efficiency purposes, cost reduction, and enhanced access to justice, presents great challenges to the right to effective participation at trial as enshrined in Article 6 echr and EU law. By analyzing ECtHR jurisprudence and EU legal instruments, this paper critiques the inadequacy of current approaches adopted by both frameworks, including the ‘normative equivalence’ and ‘tolerable differences’ models, which assumes that physical and digital participation, respectively, to be equivalent or at least, comparable. This article calls for abandoning outdated paradigms, advocating for a new framework rooted in digital rights tailored for a brand-new digital justice, in the light of the 2023 European Declaration on Digital Rights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Crime Criminal Law and Criminal Justice
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15718174-bja10063
Primary Topic
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Participation at Criminal Trials in Europe – Toward a Paradigm Shift?

Silvia Allegrezza, Lorenzo Bernardini
European Journal of Crime Criminal Law and Criminal Justice
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
article

Digital Participation at Criminal Trials in Europe – Toward a Paradigm Shift?

Silvia Allegrezza, Lorenzo Bernardini
article en

Abstract

Abstract The digitalization of criminal trials in Europe represents a transformative shift from traditional, physical courtroom settings to virtual participation. This transition, though driven by efficiency purposes, cost reduction, and enhanced access to justice, presents great challenges to the right to effective participation at trial as enshrined in Article 6 echr and EU law. By analyzing ECtHR jurisprudence and EU legal instruments, this paper critiques the inadequacy of current approaches adopted by both frameworks, including the ‘normative equivalence’ and ‘tolerable differences’ models, which assumes that physical and digital participation, respectively, to be equivalent or at least, comparable. This article calls for abandoning outdated paradigms, advocating for a new framework rooted in digital rights tailored for a brand-new digital justice, in the light of the 2023 European Declaration on Digital Rights.

European Journal of Crime Criminal Law and Criminal JusticeVol. 33(1-2)
University of Luxembourg (LU), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.