Ecumenism at a Crossroads: ‘Critical Factors’ in the Reception of Mission and Ministry in Covenant

Abstract The 2017 report on the interchangeability of ordained ministries by the joint Faith and Order bodies of the Church of England and the Methodist Church of Great Britain presented those churches with a fundamental decision about the direction of the Covenant relationship. With that decision deferred, it is important to understand the critical factors that contributed to the failure to gain sufficient momentum for the report’s proposals to proceed. This article argues that, in the case of the Church of England, alongside the more obvious conflicts regarding theological convictions around ordained ministry, the priority of mission for ecclesiology in doctrine and practice exercised a pervasive influence on the report’s formation and reception, raising fresh questions about how to describe the goal of unity that the Faith and Order bodies were ultimately unable to answer. Without sustained attention to the relationship between these three factors, it is unlikely that resistance to progress on the reconciliation of ministries can be overcome, in this and other contexts of ecumenical dialogue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecclesiology
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/17455316-21020012
Primary Topic
Christian Theology and Mission
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ecumenism at a Crossroads: ‘Critical Factors’ in the Reception of Mission and Ministry in Covenant

Jeremy Worthen
Ecclesiology
Christian Theology and Mission
article

Ecumenism at a Crossroads: ‘Critical Factors’ in the Reception of Mission and Ministry in Covenant

Jeremy Worthen
article en

Abstract

Abstract The 2017 report on the interchangeability of ordained ministries by the joint Faith and Order bodies of the Church of England and the Methodist Church of Great Britain presented those churches with a fundamental decision about the direction of the Covenant relationship. With that decision deferred, it is important to understand the critical factors that contributed to the failure to gain sufficient momentum for the report’s proposals to proceed. This article argues that, in the case of the Church of England, alongside the more obvious conflicts regarding theological convictions around ordained ministry, the priority of mission for ecclesiology in doctrine and practice exercised a pervasive influence on the report’s formation and reception, raising fresh questions about how to describe the goal of unity that the Faith and Order bodies were ultimately unable to answer. Without sustained attention to the relationship between these three factors, it is unlikely that resistance to progress on the reconciliation of ministries can be overcome, in this and other contexts of ecumenical dialogue.

EcclesiologyVol. 21(2)
Church of England (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Christian Theology and Mission
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ecumenism at a Crossroads: ‘Critical Factors’ in the Reception of Mission and Ministry in Covenant — Jeremy Worthen · Ecclesiology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS