John Milbank and the Fortunes of Postliberal Theology

Abstract The article offers a critical evaluation of John Milbank’s advocacy of postliberal theology in his writings of the last three decades. His critique of secularism and liberalism is found to be deficient in several regards and counter arguments for a critical but positive engagement with secular modernity are advanced. Liberal democracy should not be equated with possessive individualism because it involves obligations, solidarities, and the sustaining of civic life by good citizenship and virtuous traditions. The virulent rejection of the secular by Milbank, Stanley Hauerwas and Rowan Williams, misunderstands the relationship between the sacred and secular. The sacred embraces every sphere of life including the secular realm and Milbank’s account of the secular is not just inaccurate but theologically unwarranted, especially in relation to the doctrine of creation and incarnational theology.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Public Theology
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15697320-20251614
Primary Topic
Religion, Society, and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

John Milbank and the Fortunes of Postliberal Theology

John Marsden
1 links
International Journal of Public Theology
Religion, Society, and Development
article

John Milbank and the Fortunes of Postliberal Theology

John Marsden
article en

Abstract

Abstract The article offers a critical evaluation of John Milbank’s advocacy of postliberal theology in his writings of the last three decades. His critique of secularism and liberalism is found to be deficient in several regards and counter arguments for a critical but positive engagement with secular modernity are advanced. Liberal democracy should not be equated with possessive individualism because it involves obligations, solidarities, and the sustaining of civic life by good citizenship and virtuous traditions. The virulent rejection of the secular by Milbank, Stanley Hauerwas and Rowan Williams, misunderstands the relationship between the sacred and secular. The sacred embraces every sphere of life including the secular realm and Milbank’s account of the secular is not just inaccurate but theologically unwarranted, especially in relation to the doctrine of creation and incarnational theology.

International Journal of Public TheologyVol. 19(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Religion, Society, and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.