The Return of Bloc Politics: Historical Parallels Between BRICS and the Non-Aligned Movement

This study examines the transformation of the international system from a unipolar order to a new bloc architecture. The analysis focuses on two key Global South formations – BRICS and the Non-Aligned Movement – investigating their evolution within the context of global geopolitical changes after 2022. The research employs comparative and statistical analysis with a systematic approach, analyzing UN voting patterns, economic indicators of BRICS+ countries, and official statements. The methodology includes historical analysis of international organizations' evolution and content analysis of diplomatic documents. The study's key contribution is the conceptualization of "soft alignment" as a new form of international relations, distinguished from Cold War blocs by the absence of hierarchy and ideological coercion. The research reveals a correlation between countries' participation in China's Belt and Road Initiative and their voting on Ukraine-related UN resolutions. The author demonstrates the Non-Aligned Movement's transformation from passive neutrality to active strategic autonomy. The systematic analysis of UN votes on Ukrainian and Palestinian issues illustrates the changing balance of power in the international arena. The research identifies four key factors shaping African states' positions: regime security, economic interests, historical memory, and disappointment with Western solidarity. Special attention is paid to Western sanctions policy and attempts to interfere in sovereign states' internal affairs. The findings indicate the formation of a new international order based on multiple decision-making centers, rejection of any country group's monopoly on international law interpretation, and recognition of each state's right to its own development model.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Конфликтология / nota bene
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0617.2025.3.75023
Primary Topic
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Return of Bloc Politics: Historical Parallels Between BRICS and the Non-Aligned Movement

Edgar Ianitskii
Конфликтология / nota bene
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
article

The Return of Bloc Politics: Historical Parallels Between BRICS and the Non-Aligned Movement

Edgar Ianitskii
article en

Abstract

This study examines the transformation of the international system from a unipolar order to a new bloc architecture. The analysis focuses on two key Global South formations – BRICS and the Non-Aligned Movement – investigating their evolution within the context of global geopolitical changes after 2022. The research employs comparative and statistical analysis with a systematic approach, analyzing UN voting patterns, economic indicators of BRICS+ countries, and official statements. The methodology includes historical analysis of international organizations' evolution and content analysis of diplomatic documents. The study's key contribution is the conceptualization of "soft alignment" as a new form of international relations, distinguished from Cold War blocs by the absence of hierarchy and ideological coercion. The research reveals a correlation between countries' participation in China's Belt and Road Initiative and their voting on Ukraine-related UN resolutions. The author demonstrates the Non-Aligned Movement's transformation from passive neutrality to active strategic autonomy. The systematic analysis of UN votes on Ukrainian and Palestinian issues illustrates the changing balance of power in the international arena. The research identifies four key factors shaping African states' positions: regime security, economic interests, historical memory, and disappointment with Western solidarity. Special attention is paid to Western sanctions policy and attempts to interfere in sovereign states' internal affairs. The findings indicate the formation of a new international order based on multiple decision-making centers, rejection of any country group's monopoly on international law interpretation, and recognition of each state's right to its own development model.

Конфликтология / nota bene(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Return of Bloc Politics: Historical Parallels Between BRICS and the Non-Aligned Movement — Edgar Ianitskii · Конфликтология / nota bene (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS