Computed Tomography Simulation for Gamma Knife Radiosurgery: Impact on Target Coverage

This study evaluated the effectiveness of using a traditional computed tomography (CT) simulation scan in the Leksell Gamma Knife® Icon™ workflow for stereotactic radiosurgery. We compared two workflows, one involving a traditional CT simulation co-registered with the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) (MRI-CT-CBCT) and another without the CT scan, co-registering the MRI directly with CBCT (MRI-CBCT). The cohort included 50 frame-based (54 targets) and 55 frameless (124 targets) patients treated between August 2020 and December 2022. Target coverage was assessed by the percentage of each target covered by the prescription isodose line. The mean coverage differences for the frame-based and frameless cohorts were −1.20% ± 1.43% and −1.06% ± 1.51%, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals of −1.59, −0.81 and −1.32, −0.79. The MRI-CBCT workflow was deemed noninferior to the MRI-CT-CBCT workflow. Our data indicate that both workflows yield similar results, suggesting that a traditional CT simulation scan is unnecessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Physics
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_193_24
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computed Tomography Simulation for Gamma Knife Radiosurgery: Impact on Target Coverage

Deepak K. Shrestha, Jennifer Peterson, Katherine A. Lane, Anna Harrell et al.
Journal of Medical Physics
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Computed Tomography Simulation for Gamma Knife Radiosurgery: Impact on Target Coverage

Deepak K. Shrestha, Jennifer Peterson, Katherine A. Lane, Anna Harrell, Sanjeet S. Grewal, Sridhar Yaddanapudi, Steven M. Herchko, Bonita L. Gianforti, Daniel M. Trifiletti, W. Christopher Fox, Kathleen A. Kopacka
article en

Abstract

This study evaluated the effectiveness of using a traditional computed tomography (CT) simulation scan in the Leksell Gamma Knife® Icon™ workflow for stereotactic radiosurgery. We compared two workflows, one involving a traditional CT simulation co-registered with the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) (MRI-CT-CBCT) and another without the CT scan, co-registering the MRI directly with CBCT (MRI-CBCT). The cohort included 50 frame-based (54 targets) and 55 frameless (124 targets) patients treated between August 2020 and December 2022. Target coverage was assessed by the percentage of each target covered by the prescription isodose line. The mean coverage differences for the frame-based and frameless cohorts were −1.20% ± 1.43% and −1.06% ± 1.51%, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals of −1.59, −0.81 and −1.32, −0.79. The MRI-CBCT workflow was deemed noninferior to the MRI-CT-CBCT workflow. Our data indicate that both workflows yield similar results, suggesting that a traditional CT simulation scan is unnecessary.

Journal of Medical PhysicsVol. 50(2)
WinnMed (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Computed Tomography Simulation for Gamma Knife Radiosurgery: Impact on Target Coverage — Deepak K. Shrestha, Jennifer Peterson, et al. · Journal of Medical Physics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS