Normal Tissue Objective Parameter Optimization in Eclipse Treatment Planning System: Enhancing Stereotactic Radiosurgery Quality with Noncoplanar RapidArc versus HyperArc Plans

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify the most effective manual normal tissue objective (mNTO) parameters for noncoplanar RapidArc (RA) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) plans and assess their performance against HyperArc (HA) plans. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 28 patients with single brain metastasis prescribed 21 Gy. Noncoplanar RA (RA-mNTO) plans were generated using dose fall-offs of 0.1–5.0 mm −1 and end doses of 50%, 25%, and 10%. In addition, two HA plans were created for comparison: one with SRS NTO (HA-sNTO) and the other with mNTO (HA-mNTO). Plans were evaluated using an integrated scoring approach that include Paddick Conformity Index (CI), gradient index (GI), homogeneity index (HI), monitor units (MUs), normal brain doses (V 18 Gy , V 15 Gy , and V 12 Gy ), and delivery accuracy with aS1200 portal dosimetry applying 3%/1 mm gamma criteria. Statistical analysis was carried out using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: RA-mNTO plan with a 25% end-dose and a 0.5 mm −1 dose fall-off significantly outperformed HA plans ( P < 0.05) in CI, GI, and HI values (0.92 ± 0.02, 3.0 ± 0.17, and 0.32 ± 0.05 vs. 0.91 ± 0.04, 3.41 ± 0.19, and 0.40 ± 0.04 for HA-sNTO and 0.90 ± 0.04, 3.17 ± 0.24, and 0.40 ± 0.05 for HA-mNTO). Furthermore, RA-mNTO significantly ( P < 0.05) reduced brain doses at V18Gy (0.88 cc ± 0.40), V15Gy (1.80 cc ± 0.77), and V12Gy (3.19 cc ± 1.35) compared to HA-sNTO (1.13 cc ± 0.51, 2.30 cc ± 1.01, 3.96 cc ± 1.72) and HA-mNTO (1.02 cc ± 0.44, 2.06 cc ± 0.86, 3.53 cc ± 1.47). Moreover, RA-mNTO showed significantly ( P < 0.05) lower MUs (8238 ± 948) compared to HA-sNTO (9505 ± 1098) and HA-mNTO (9315 ± 421) and higher gamma pass rates (99.8% ± 0.39) than HA-sNTO (98.9% ± 0.68) and HA-mNTO (99.0% ± 0.51). Conclusion: Optimized mNTO (25% end-dose and a 0.5 mm −1 dose fall-off)-based noncoplanar RA plans outperformed HA in SRS treatment of single brain metastasis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Physics
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_40_25
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Normal Tissue Objective Parameter Optimization in Eclipse Treatment Planning System: Enhancing Stereotactic Radiosurgery Quality with Noncoplanar RapidArc versus HyperArc Plans

Sivakumar Muthu, Gopinath Mudhana
Journal of Medical Physics
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Normal Tissue Objective Parameter Optimization in Eclipse Treatment Planning System: Enhancing Stereotactic Radiosurgery Quality with Noncoplanar RapidArc versus HyperArc Plans

Sivakumar Muthu, Gopinath Mudhana
article en

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify the most effective manual normal tissue objective (mNTO) parameters for noncoplanar RapidArc (RA) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) plans and assess their performance against HyperArc (HA) plans. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 28 patients with single brain metastasis prescribed 21 Gy. Noncoplanar RA (RA-mNTO) plans were generated using dose fall-offs of 0.1–5.0 mm −1 and end doses of 50%, 25%, and 10%. In addition, two HA plans were created for comparison: one with SRS NTO (HA-sNTO) and the other with mNTO (HA-mNTO). Plans were evaluated using an integrated scoring approach that include Paddick Conformity Index (CI), gradient index (GI), homogeneity index (HI), monitor units (MUs), normal brain doses (V 18 Gy , V 15 Gy , and V 12 Gy ), and delivery accuracy with aS1200 portal dosimetry applying 3%/1 mm gamma criteria. Statistical analysis was carried out using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: RA-mNTO plan with a 25% end-dose and a 0.5 mm −1 dose fall-off significantly outperformed HA plans ( P < 0.05) in CI, GI, and HI values (0.92 ± 0.02, 3.0 ± 0.17, and 0.32 ± 0.05 vs. 0.91 ± 0.04, 3.41 ± 0.19, and 0.40 ± 0.04 for HA-sNTO and 0.90 ± 0.04, 3.17 ± 0.24, and 0.40 ± 0.05 for HA-mNTO). Furthermore, RA-mNTO significantly ( P < 0.05) reduced brain doses at V18Gy (0.88 cc ± 0.40), V15Gy (1.80 cc ± 0.77), and V12Gy (3.19 cc ± 1.35) compared to HA-sNTO (1.13 cc ± 0.51, 2.30 cc ± 1.01, 3.96 cc ± 1.72) and HA-mNTO (1.02 cc ± 0.44, 2.06 cc ± 0.86, 3.53 cc ± 1.47). Moreover, RA-mNTO showed significantly ( P < 0.05) lower MUs (8238 ± 948) compared to HA-sNTO (9505 ± 1098) and HA-mNTO (9315 ± 421) and higher gamma pass rates (99.8% ± 0.39) than HA-sNTO (98.9% ± 0.68) and HA-mNTO (99.0% ± 0.51). Conclusion: Optimized mNTO (25% end-dose and a 0.5 mm −1 dose fall-off)-based noncoplanar RA plans outperformed HA in SRS treatment of single brain metastasis.

Journal of Medical PhysicsVol. 50(2)
HCG Cancer Hospital (IN), Sri Shankara Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.