Reading strategy use of upper primary school students in a task-oriented context

This study explores the reading strategy use of low- and high-achieving upper primary school readers (N = 24) through the analysis of think-aloud protocols. Given the situational dependency of reading strategy use, one specific context was explored, namely a task-oriented reading context involving text-related questions. By employing direct observations, this study avoids the limitations associated with self-reports, which are most common in the current literature base. Overall, a limited use of cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies was observed. Small disparities in cognitive reading strategy use between low- and high-achieving readers were observed, while large differences emerged in the use of metacognitive reading strategies and task-related activities. High-achieving readers demonstrated more metacognition, reread the text more frequently for relevant information, and located this information more efficiently than low-achieving readers. Self-assessment was rarely observed and was only conducted by high achievers when evaluating answers to text-related questions. Implications for teachers are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Educational Research
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2025.2515910
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reading strategy use of upper primary school students in a task-oriented context

Hilde Van Keer, Koen Aesaert, Katrijn Denies, Marieke Vanbuel et al.
The Journal of Educational Research
Reading and Literacy Development
article

Reading strategy use of upper primary school students in a task-oriented context

Hilde Van Keer, Koen Aesaert, Katrijn Denies, Marieke Vanbuel, Nele Bleukx
article en

Abstract

This study explores the reading strategy use of low- and high-achieving upper primary school readers (N = 24) through the analysis of think-aloud protocols. Given the situational dependency of reading strategy use, one specific context was explored, namely a task-oriented reading context involving text-related questions. By employing direct observations, this study avoids the limitations associated with self-reports, which are most common in the current literature base. Overall, a limited use of cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies was observed. Small disparities in cognitive reading strategy use between low- and high-achieving readers were observed, while large differences emerged in the use of metacognitive reading strategies and task-related activities. High-achieving readers demonstrated more metacognition, reread the text more frequently for relevant information, and located this information more efficiently than low-achieving readers. Self-assessment was rarely observed and was only conducted by high achievers when evaluating answers to text-related questions. Implications for teachers are discussed.

The Journal of Educational ResearchVol. 119(1)
Ghent University (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Vlaamse Overheid
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.