Comparative analysis of 3D culture methodologies in prostate cancer cells

Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture models are increasingly utilized in cancer research to better replicate in vivo tumor microenvironments. This study examines the effects of different 3D scaffolding materials, including Matrigel, GelTrex, and the plant-based GrowDex, on prostate cancer cell lines, with a particular emphasis on neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC). Four cell lines (LNCaP, LASCPC-01, PC-3, and KUCaP13) were cultured in these scaffolds using the sandwich method to evaluate spheroid formation, cell viability, and gene expression. The results revealed that while all scaffolds supported cell viability, spheroid formation varied significantly: Matrigel promoted the most consistent spheroid formation, exhibiting the best results for LASCPC-01 among the tested scaffolds, though spheroid formation for LASCPC-01 was generally more limited than for LNCaP. Gene expression analysis indicated a reduction in androgen receptor (AR) expression in LNCaP cells across all scaffolds using the sandwich method. However, further experiments using a mini-dome method revealed that the expression of AR signaling genes and neuroendocrine marker genes varied depending on the scaffolds and culture methods. These findings highlight the scaffold-dependent variability in 3D culture outcomes and emphasize the need for standardized methodologies to ensure consistency and relevance in prostate cancer research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Experimental Cell Research
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2025.114666
Citations
1
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of 3D culture methodologies in prostate cancer cells

Xin Lü, Zih-Ming Zeng, Eugene A. Foster, Oliver Wardhana
1 citations
Experimental Cell Research
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
0.67
article

Comparative analysis of 3D culture methodologies in prostate cancer cells

Xin Lü, Zih-Ming Zeng, Eugene A. Foster, Oliver Wardhana
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture models are increasingly utilized in cancer research to better replicate in vivo tumor microenvironments. This study examines the effects of different 3D scaffolding materials, including Matrigel, GelTrex, and the plant-based GrowDex, on prostate cancer cell lines, with a particular emphasis on neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC). Four cell lines (LNCaP, LASCPC-01, PC-3, and KUCaP13) were cultured in these scaffolds using the sandwich method to evaluate spheroid formation, cell viability, and gene expression. The results revealed that while all scaffolds supported cell viability, spheroid formation varied significantly: Matrigel promoted the most consistent spheroid formation, exhibiting the best results for LASCPC-01 among the tested scaffolds, though spheroid formation for LASCPC-01 was generally more limited than for LNCaP. Gene expression analysis indicated a reduction in androgen receptor (AR) expression in LNCaP cells across all scaffolds using the sandwich method. However, further experiments using a mini-dome method revealed that the expression of AR signaling genes and neuroendocrine marker genes varied depending on the scaffolds and culture methods. These findings highlight the scaffold-dependent variability in 3D culture outcomes and emphasize the need for standardized methodologies to ensure consistency and relevance in prostate cancer research.

Experimental Cell ResearchVol. 450(2)
University of Notre Dame (US), Indiana University Health (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
U.S. Department of Defense, Boler Family Foundation, University of Notre Dame, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative analysis of 3D culture methodologies in prostate cancer cells — Xin Lü, Zih-Ming Zeng, et al. · Experimental Cell Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS