Banbury Forum Consensus Statement on the Path Forward for Digital Mental Health Treatment

A major obstacle to mental health treatment for many Americans is accessibility: the United States faces a shortage of mental health providers, resulting in federally designated shortage areas. Although digital mental health treatments (DMHTs) are effective interventions for common mental disorders, they have not been widely adopted by the U.S. health care system. National and international expert stakeholders representing health care organizations, insurance companies and payers, employers, patients, researchers, policy makers, health economists, and DMHT companies and the investment community attended two Banbury Forum meetings. The Banbury Forum reviewed the evidence for DMHTs, identified the challenges to successful and sustainable implementation, investigated the factors that contributed to more successful implementation internationally, and developed the following recommendations: guided DMHTs should be offered to all patients experiencing common mental disorders, DMHT products and services should be reimbursable to support integration into the U.S. health care landscape, and an evidence standards framework should be developed to support decision makers in evaluating DMHTs. Reprinted from <i>Psychiatr Serv 2021; 72:677-683</i>, with permission from American Psychiatric Association. Copyright © 2021.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FOCUS The Journal of Lifelong Learning in Psychiatry
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.25023021
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Banbury Forum Consensus Statement on the Path Forward for Digital Mental Health Treatment

Stephen Matthew Schueller, Trina Histon, Andrew Bertagnolli, Patricia A. Areán et al.
FOCUS The Journal of Lifelong Learning in Psychiatry
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Banbury Forum Consensus Statement on the Path Forward for Digital Mental Health Treatment

Stephen Matthew Schueller, Trina Histon, Andrew Bertagnolli, Patricia A. Areán, John Blake Torous, Henry T. Harbin, Richard Frank, Camille Nebeker, Francisca Azocar, Tanzeem Choudhury, Derek Richards, Paul Chrisp, Debra Kaysen, Nickolai Titov, David C. Mohr
article en

Abstract

A major obstacle to mental health treatment for many Americans is accessibility: the United States faces a shortage of mental health providers, resulting in federally designated shortage areas. Although digital mental health treatments (DMHTs) are effective interventions for common mental disorders, they have not been widely adopted by the U.S. health care system. National and international expert stakeholders representing health care organizations, insurance companies and payers, employers, patients, researchers, policy makers, health economists, and DMHT companies and the investment community attended two Banbury Forum meetings. The Banbury Forum reviewed the evidence for DMHTs, identified the challenges to successful and sustainable implementation, investigated the factors that contributed to more successful implementation internationally, and developed the following recommendations: guided DMHTs should be offered to all patients experiencing common mental disorders, DMHT products and services should be reimbursable to support integration into the U.S. health care landscape, and an evidence standards framework should be developed to support decision makers in evaluating DMHTs. Reprinted from <i>Psychiatr Serv 2021; 72:677-683</i>, with permission from American Psychiatric Association. Copyright © 2021.

FOCUS The Journal of Lifelong Learning in PsychiatryVol. 23(3)
Cornell University (US), Medical Care Development International (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.