Psychometric properties of persian version of malevolent creativity behavior scale in a sample of iranian students

Background and Purpose: Creativity is generally considered a positive attribute.However, certain aspects of creativity can manifest as malevolent behavior.Measuring this malevolent aspect of creativity requires a valid scale.The purpose of this research was to determine the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Malevolent Creativity Behavior Scale (MCBS;Hao et al., 2016) to evaluate the malevolent creativity of Iranian students.Method: The present study was a descriptive-survey study that evaluated the psychometric properties of the MCBS, including various types of validity and reliability.The study population included all senior high school students (15 to 18 years old) in District 1 of Rasht, Iran, during the 2023-2024 academic year.Then a sample of 393 students was selected among this population through random cluster sampling and they responded to the MCBS.Validity was assessed using face validity, content validity, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).Reliability was evaluated using internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), split-half reliability, and composite reliability.Data were analyzed using SPSS -26 and AMOS -24.Results: To evaluate psychometric indices for validity, face validity was assessed qualitatively and quantitatively and content validity was assessed using the content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (CVI).Results indicated adequate qualitative and quantitative face validity, with all item impact scores exceeding 1.5.The CVR and CVI scores for the scale items were also adequate, exceeding 0.8.CFA results confirmed the three-factor structure (hurting people, lying, and playing tricks) with good model fit indices.Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, split-half reliability, and composite reliability.Cronbach's alpha was 0.79, 0.82, and 0.68 for the three factors, respectively, and 0.83 for the total scale.Split-half reliability (0.66) and composite reliability (0.91) were also satisfactory. Conclusion:Based on the present study's findings and the importance of evaluating malevolent creativity, the Persian version of the MCBS appears to be a suitable tool for evaluating this concept in students.Further research is recommended to administer and standardize this scale among different age groups and populations with varying characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quarterly Journal of Child Mental Health
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61186/jcmh.11.4.1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric properties of persian version of malevolent creativity behavior scale in a sample of iranian students

Ashkan Naseh, Abbas Ali Hosseinkhanzadeh, Ghazale Nahavandi
1 citations
Quarterly Journal of Child Mental Health
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
0.51
article

Psychometric properties of persian version of malevolent creativity behavior scale in a sample of iranian students

Ashkan Naseh, Abbas Ali Hosseinkhanzadeh, Ghazale Nahavandi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Creativity is generally considered a positive attribute.However, certain aspects of creativity can manifest as malevolent behavior.Measuring this malevolent aspect of creativity requires a valid scale.The purpose of this research was to determine the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Malevolent Creativity Behavior Scale (MCBS;Hao et al., 2016) to evaluate the malevolent creativity of Iranian students.Method: The present study was a descriptive-survey study that evaluated the psychometric properties of the MCBS, including various types of validity and reliability.The study population included all senior high school students (15 to 18 years old) in District 1 of Rasht, Iran, during the 2023-2024 academic year.Then a sample of 393 students was selected among this population through random cluster sampling and they responded to the MCBS.Validity was assessed using face validity, content validity, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).Reliability was evaluated using internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), split-half reliability, and composite reliability.Data were analyzed using SPSS -26 and AMOS -24.Results: To evaluate psychometric indices for validity, face validity was assessed qualitatively and quantitatively and content validity was assessed using the content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (CVI).Results indicated adequate qualitative and quantitative face validity, with all item impact scores exceeding 1.5.The CVR and CVI scores for the scale items were also adequate, exceeding 0.8.CFA results confirmed the three-factor structure (hurting people, lying, and playing tricks) with good model fit indices.Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, split-half reliability, and composite reliability.Cronbach's alpha was 0.79, 0.82, and 0.68 for the three factors, respectively, and 0.83 for the total scale.Split-half reliability (0.66) and composite reliability (0.91) were also satisfactory. Conclusion:Based on the present study's findings and the importance of evaluating malevolent creativity, the Persian version of the MCBS appears to be a suitable tool for evaluating this concept in students.Further research is recommended to administer and standardize this scale among different age groups and populations with varying characteristics.

Quarterly Journal of Child Mental HealthVol. 11(4)
University of Guilan (IR)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
0.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.