A - 51 Delayed Presentation After a Sports-Related Concussion and Clinical Metrics

Abstract Purpose To identify factors that impact presentation timeline to a healthcare provider after a sports-related concussion (SRC). Method A retrospective study analyzed 447 athletes aged 12–23 who presented to a regional sports concussion center. Patient information and injury details were extracted from medical records. Clinical presentation was dichotomized as immediate (i.e., 1) athlete withheld from play after on-field evaluation by provider at time of injury or 2) athlete presented to a clinical setting immediately after practice/game) vs. delayed (i.e., those who failed to present immediately to a provider after the injury/competition or those who did not seek care from a physician until the next day). Clinical symptoms and recovery were compared between the groups. Results While sex, race, sport, school type, and competition type did not significantly influence immediate (n = 200) vs. delayed (n = 166) presentations, on-field evaluation predicted immediate presentation (B: 0.008, p = 0.001). Even with an on-field evaluation, some patients (n = 34) had delayed care, most commonly due to non-immediate disclosure of symptoms to the on-field provider (44.1%). Delayed athletes had a significantly higher initial post-concussion symptom scores (median = 24.0, IQR = 11.0–40.3) than those without (median = 17.0, IQR = 5.0–36.5; H = 6.982, p = 0.008). Post-hoc analysis of a data subset revealed no significant differences in time to return-to-learn, symptom resolution, or return-to-play. Conclusions On-field evaluations by a healthcare provider are critical for timely care after SRCs, and delayed care often resulted from the athlete’s hesitance to report injuries immediately. Therefore, it is important to prioritize increasing provider presence at sporting events, such as more ATCs, and educating athletes to promptly report injuries.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaf058.51
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A - 51 Delayed Presentation After a Sports-Related Concussion and Clinical Metrics

Jie Bao, Kristen J. Williams, Robert Fitch, Douglas P. Terry et al.
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

A - 51 Delayed Presentation After a Sports-Related Concussion and Clinical Metrics

Jie Bao, Kristen J. Williams, Robert Fitch, Douglas P. Terry, Katharina Zöller, S L Zuckerman, Catherine Baker
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To identify factors that impact presentation timeline to a healthcare provider after a sports-related concussion (SRC). Method A retrospective study analyzed 447 athletes aged 12–23 who presented to a regional sports concussion center. Patient information and injury details were extracted from medical records. Clinical presentation was dichotomized as immediate (i.e., 1) athlete withheld from play after on-field evaluation by provider at time of injury or 2) athlete presented to a clinical setting immediately after practice/game) vs. delayed (i.e., those who failed to present immediately to a provider after the injury/competition or those who did not seek care from a physician until the next day). Clinical symptoms and recovery were compared between the groups. Results While sex, race, sport, school type, and competition type did not significantly influence immediate (n = 200) vs. delayed (n = 166) presentations, on-field evaluation predicted immediate presentation (B: 0.008, p = 0.001). Even with an on-field evaluation, some patients (n = 34) had delayed care, most commonly due to non-immediate disclosure of symptoms to the on-field provider (44.1%). Delayed athletes had a significantly higher initial post-concussion symptom scores (median = 24.0, IQR = 11.0–40.3) than those without (median = 17.0, IQR = 5.0–36.5; H = 6.982, p = 0.008). Post-hoc analysis of a data subset revealed no significant differences in time to return-to-learn, symptom resolution, or return-to-play. Conclusions On-field evaluations by a healthcare provider are critical for timely care after SRCs, and delayed care often resulted from the athlete’s hesitance to report injuries immediately. Therefore, it is important to prioritize increasing provider presence at sporting events, such as more ATCs, and educating athletes to promptly report injuries.

Archives of Clinical NeuropsychologyVol. 40(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.