A - 32 Concussion Symptom Network Analysis Comparisons Into Recovery

Abstract Purpose Network analysis comparisons on concussion symptoms show network structure changes exist from baseline to acute post-concussion, suggesting concussion alters symptom interactions. However, a follow-up assessment has not been included in these comparisons to determine if symptom relationship differences remain into recovery. The current study conducted comparisons between Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS) networks at baseline and acute post-concussion with a recovery assessment to determine whether network differences remain or return to the baseline characteristics. Method High school athletes (n = 1256; Mage =14.7, SDage = 1.00; 38.1% girls at baseline) completed the PCSS in English at baseline (only valid included), acute post-concussion (within 72 hours post-injury), and recovery (~2 weeks post-injury). Athletes were excluded if they endorsed history of neurodevelopmental disorder, brain surgery, or concussion or treatment for migraines, epilepsy, meningitis, psychiatric disorders, and alcohol/substance use. Network analyses on PCSS scores were conducted for each assessment; Network Comparison Tests compared the networks on connectivity (global strength) and structure (edge weight distribution). Results The recovery PCSS network’s structure did not significantly differ from baseline (M = 0.222, p = 0.525) or acute post-concussion (M = 0.201, p = 0.058). The recovery network’s overall connectivity was significantly greater than baseline (S = 2.24, p = 0.002) and acute post-concussion (S = 1.75, p = 0.001). Conclusions While PCSS network structure changes observed at acute post-concussion return to the baseline structure in recovery, overall connectivity between symptoms is heightened, suggesting symptom interactions remain altered up to 2 weeks post-concussion. Future research should conduct comparisons with more generalizable samples based on pre-existing characteristics and include data on psychosocial factors to determine if they moderate the results found.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaf058.32
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A - 32 Concussion Symptom Network Analysis Comparisons Into Recovery

Daniel N. Allen, T Kinsora, Clara Oliveras Salvà, Stephen R. Ross et al.
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

A - 32 Concussion Symptom Network Analysis Comparisons Into Recovery

Daniel N. Allen, T Kinsora, Clara Oliveras Salvà, Stephen R. Ross, G J Goodwin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Network analysis comparisons on concussion symptoms show network structure changes exist from baseline to acute post-concussion, suggesting concussion alters symptom interactions. However, a follow-up assessment has not been included in these comparisons to determine if symptom relationship differences remain into recovery. The current study conducted comparisons between Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS) networks at baseline and acute post-concussion with a recovery assessment to determine whether network differences remain or return to the baseline characteristics. Method High school athletes (n = 1256; Mage =14.7, SDage = 1.00; 38.1% girls at baseline) completed the PCSS in English at baseline (only valid included), acute post-concussion (within 72 hours post-injury), and recovery (~2 weeks post-injury). Athletes were excluded if they endorsed history of neurodevelopmental disorder, brain surgery, or concussion or treatment for migraines, epilepsy, meningitis, psychiatric disorders, and alcohol/substance use. Network analyses on PCSS scores were conducted for each assessment; Network Comparison Tests compared the networks on connectivity (global strength) and structure (edge weight distribution). Results The recovery PCSS network’s structure did not significantly differ from baseline (M = 0.222, p = 0.525) or acute post-concussion (M = 0.201, p = 0.058). The recovery network’s overall connectivity was significantly greater than baseline (S = 2.24, p = 0.002) and acute post-concussion (S = 1.75, p = 0.001). Conclusions While PCSS network structure changes observed at acute post-concussion return to the baseline structure in recovery, overall connectivity between symptoms is heightened, suggesting symptom interactions remain altered up to 2 weeks post-concussion. Future research should conduct comparisons with more generalizable samples based on pre-existing characteristics and include data on psychosocial factors to determine if they moderate the results found.

Archives of Clinical NeuropsychologyVol. 40(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A - 32 Concussion Symptom Network Analysis Comparisons Into Recovery — Daniel N. Allen, T Kinsora, et al. · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS