Equivalence of Plasma and Serum for Clinical Measurement of p‐tau217: Comparative Analyses of Four Blood‐Based Assays

Phosphorylated tau (p-tau) 217 is a promising blood biomarker for Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, most p-tau217 assays have been validated solely in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) plasma, leaving the clinical applicability of serum p-tau217 largely unexplored despite serum being a preferred matrix in many clinical laboratories. To address this gap, we compared p-tau217 concentrations and classification accuracies in matched plasma and serum samples in four research-use-only assays. Paired plasma and serum samples were processed from the same venipuncture collection and assessed with each of the four p-tau217 assays following manufacturer-recommended procedures in two research cohorts from the University of Pittsburgh Azheimer's Disease Research Center (Pitt-ADRC; n = 50) and the Human Connectome Project (n = 34). The four assays evaluated included three from commercial sources-Lumipulse (recently gained FDA approval), ALZpath, and NULISA-and another from the University of Pittsburgh (Pittsburgh plasma p-tau217). Plasma and serum p-tau217 levels varied across assays; the ALZpath, Pittsburgh, and NULISA methods showed significantly lower p-tau217 levels in serum compared with plasma (p < 0.0001) for both cohorts, while Lumipulse showed higher plasma levels in the Pitt-ADRC cohort but equivalent plasma and serum levels in the HCP cohort. Yet, strong correlations (rho > 0.8) were observed between plasma and serum p-tau217 pairs for all methods. Both plasma and serum p-tau217 demonstrated strong classification accuracies to differentiate clinical AD from normal controls, with high AUC (up to 0.963) for all methods. The exception was the Pittsburgh assay, where plasma p-tau217 had significantly superior AUC to serum p-tau217 (plasma: 0.912, serum: 0.844). The rest of the assays had equivalent accuracies in both matrices. Serum p-tau217 performs equivalently as plasma p-tau217 for most assessed assays. Serum can be used as a substitute for plasma in the use of most p-tau217 assays to evaluate Aβ pathology in AD for both research and clinical purposes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurochemistry
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.70114
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Equivalence of Plasma and Serum for Clinical Measurement of p‐tau217: Comparative Analyses of Four Blood‐Based Assays

Óscar López, Xuemei Zeng, Ann D. Cohen, Anuradha Sehrawat et al.
9 citations
Journal of Neurochemistry
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
10.48
article

Equivalence of Plasma and Serum for Clinical Measurement of p‐tau217: Comparative Analyses of Four Blood‐Based Assays

Óscar López, Xuemei Zeng, Ann D. Cohen, Anuradha Sehrawat, Thomas K. Karikari, Yijun Chen, Adelin Albert, M. Carmen Fariñas
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Phosphorylated tau (p-tau) 217 is a promising blood biomarker for Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, most p-tau217 assays have been validated solely in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) plasma, leaving the clinical applicability of serum p-tau217 largely unexplored despite serum being a preferred matrix in many clinical laboratories. To address this gap, we compared p-tau217 concentrations and classification accuracies in matched plasma and serum samples in four research-use-only assays. Paired plasma and serum samples were processed from the same venipuncture collection and assessed with each of the four p-tau217 assays following manufacturer-recommended procedures in two research cohorts from the University of Pittsburgh Azheimer's Disease Research Center (Pitt-ADRC; n = 50) and the Human Connectome Project (n = 34). The four assays evaluated included three from commercial sources-Lumipulse (recently gained FDA approval), ALZpath, and NULISA-and another from the University of Pittsburgh (Pittsburgh plasma p-tau217). Plasma and serum p-tau217 levels varied across assays; the ALZpath, Pittsburgh, and NULISA methods showed significantly lower p-tau217 levels in serum compared with plasma (p < 0.0001) for both cohorts, while Lumipulse showed higher plasma levels in the Pitt-ADRC cohort but equivalent plasma and serum levels in the HCP cohort. Yet, strong correlations (rho > 0.8) were observed between plasma and serum p-tau217 pairs for all methods. Both plasma and serum p-tau217 demonstrated strong classification accuracies to differentiate clinical AD from normal controls, with high AUC (up to 0.963) for all methods. The exception was the Pittsburgh assay, where plasma p-tau217 had significantly superior AUC to serum p-tau217 (plasma: 0.912, serum: 0.844). The rest of the assays had equivalent accuracies in both matrices. Serum p-tau217 performs equivalently as plasma p-tau217 for most assessed assays. Serum can be used as a substitute for plasma in the use of most p-tau217 assays to evaluate Aβ pathology in AD for both research and clinical purposes.

Journal of NeurochemistryVol. 169(7)
University of Pittsburgh (US)
U.S. Department of Defense, University of Pittsburgh, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
10.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.