Features of the formation of collections and subject areas of scientific journals in the scientometric databases Scopus and Web of Science

The research relevance is determined by the growing role of Scopus and Web of Science as key tools for evaluation of scientific activities and the need to optimise the processes of forming collections and determining the subject areas of scientific journals to increase visibility and influence in the global scientific space. The study aimed to analyse the peculiarities of forming collections and determining the subject areas of scientific journals indexed in the international scientometric databases Scopus and Web of Science. Research methods included analysis and synthesis, systematisation and generalisation of data, as well as content analysis of scientometric databases Scopus and Web of Science, used to identify the specifics of the formation of collections and subject areas of scientific periodicals. The criteria for the selection of periodicals, the structure of subject areas and the specifics of the formation of collections in Web of Science were addressed. Differences in approaches to the classification of scientific journals by subject areas were analySed, and the impact of these differences on the representativeness of scientific research in various fields of knowledge was investigated. The main trends in the development of collections and subject areas of scientific journals in the context of modern requirements for scientometric indicators and international standards of scientific communication were identified. The study demonstrated that the Scopus and Web of Science databases have different approaches to classifying subject areas. The study determined that Scopus is characterised by a wider coverage of journals, especially in the social and medical sciences, while Web of Science emphasises journals with a high impact factor. The classification of subject areas is also different, which should be accounted fur during search and analysis of scientific sources. The practical significance of the study is determined by empirically grounded data on the formation of journal collections and subject areas in Scopus and Web of Science, which will contribute to optimisation of publication strategies, increasing research visibility, and improving the evaluation of scientific contribution, therefore beneficial for researchers and postgraduate students

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Society Document Communication
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69587/sdc/1.2025.55
Primary Topic
Scientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Features of the formation of collections and subject areas of scientific journals in the scientometric databases Scopus and Web of Science

Олеся Федорук
1 links
Society Document Communication
Scientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry
article

Features of the formation of collections and subject areas of scientific journals in the scientometric databases Scopus and Web of Science

Олеся Федорук
article en

Abstract

The research relevance is determined by the growing role of Scopus and Web of Science as key tools for evaluation of scientific activities and the need to optimise the processes of forming collections and determining the subject areas of scientific journals to increase visibility and influence in the global scientific space. The study aimed to analyse the peculiarities of forming collections and determining the subject areas of scientific journals indexed in the international scientometric databases Scopus and Web of Science. Research methods included analysis and synthesis, systematisation and generalisation of data, as well as content analysis of scientometric databases Scopus and Web of Science, used to identify the specifics of the formation of collections and subject areas of scientific periodicals. The criteria for the selection of periodicals, the structure of subject areas and the specifics of the formation of collections in Web of Science were addressed. Differences in approaches to the classification of scientific journals by subject areas were analySed, and the impact of these differences on the representativeness of scientific research in various fields of knowledge was investigated. The main trends in the development of collections and subject areas of scientific journals in the context of modern requirements for scientometric indicators and international standards of scientific communication were identified. The study demonstrated that the Scopus and Web of Science databases have different approaches to classifying subject areas. The study determined that Scopus is characterised by a wider coverage of journals, especially in the social and medical sciences, while Web of Science emphasises journals with a high impact factor. The classification of subject areas is also different, which should be accounted fur during search and analysis of scientific sources. The practical significance of the study is determined by empirically grounded data on the formation of journal collections and subject areas in Scopus and Web of Science, which will contribute to optimisation of publication strategies, increasing research visibility, and improving the evaluation of scientific contribution, therefore beneficial for researchers and postgraduate students

Society Document CommunicationVol. 10(1)
National University Ostroh Academy (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Scientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.