Early Childhood Administrators Views on LGBTQ Books: A Mixed Methods Study

There is limited empirical literature on the study of LGBTQ books, and even less on the perspective of early childhood center administrators on these books. Hence, a mixed methods study surveying the administrators of high-quality early childhood centers across the state of North Carolina was implemented. Sixty-five participants completed the survey, and both quantitative and qualitative data were gathered and analyzed. The findings indicated that the majority (64%) of the administrators had read at least one book from the listed LGBTQ books, while the rest had never read a single book from the listing. Their familiarity with the book content was based on reading the book only once, and they only “somewhat” recalled the content of the book. These findings indicate a lack of regular use of LGBTQ books in the centers. The administrators made both negative and positive comments on the survey administered and the books in general. The results indicate a need for education and training to focus on the connection of LGBTQ topics and how they are developmentally appropriate, as well as the connection to the NAEYC Code of Ethics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070832
Citations
1
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early Childhood Administrators Views on LGBTQ Books: A Mixed Methods Study

Anne Ticknor, Archana V. Hegde, Paige Averett, Madison Alexander et al.
1 citations
Education Sciences
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
2.44
article

Early Childhood Administrators Views on LGBTQ Books: A Mixed Methods Study

Anne Ticknor, Archana V. Hegde, Paige Averett, Madison Alexander, Lanie Philips Holmes
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There is limited empirical literature on the study of LGBTQ books, and even less on the perspective of early childhood center administrators on these books. Hence, a mixed methods study surveying the administrators of high-quality early childhood centers across the state of North Carolina was implemented. Sixty-five participants completed the survey, and both quantitative and qualitative data were gathered and analyzed. The findings indicated that the majority (64%) of the administrators had read at least one book from the listed LGBTQ books, while the rest had never read a single book from the listing. Their familiarity with the book content was based on reading the book only once, and they only “somewhat” recalled the content of the book. These findings indicate a lack of regular use of LGBTQ books in the centers. The administrators made both negative and positive comments on the survey administered and the books in general. The results indicate a need for education and training to focus on the connection of LGBTQ topics and how they are developmentally appropriate, as well as the connection to the NAEYC Code of Ethics.

Education SciencesVol. 15(7)
North Carolina State University (US), East Carolina University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Early Childhood Administrators Views on LGBTQ Books: A Mixed Methods Study — Anne Ticknor, Archana V. Hegde, et al. · Education Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS