When and How Do Presidents Terminate Sanctions? The Effect of Domestic Factors on US Sanctions Policy

Abstract How do domestic factors influence US presidents’ decisions to lift sanctions? Drawing on work emphasizing the domestic costs related to leaders’ foreign policy decisions, I argue that a president's political capital vis-à-vis the public and Congress, as well as Congress's anticipated responses, influences when and how presidents lift sanctions. Analyzing novel data on all US sanctions imposed between 1990 and 2018 with a competing risks model, I uncover two key findings: First, presidents with stronger party power in Congress and higher public approval ratings are more likely to end sanctions, particularly by capitulation. Second, sanctions that include mechanisms of congressional oversight last longer and are less likely to be lifted by the president before achieving their goals. Interviews with US sanctions practitioners and anecdotal evidence complement these statistical findings, underscoring the role of domestic actors in shaping sanctions policy and highlighting that lifting sanctions is often harder than imposing them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foreign Policy Analysis
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/oraf022
Primary Topic
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When and How Do Presidents Terminate Sanctions? The Effect of Domestic Factors on US Sanctions Policy

Hana Attia
Foreign Policy Analysis
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
article

When and How Do Presidents Terminate Sanctions? The Effect of Domestic Factors on US Sanctions Policy

Hana Attia
article en

Abstract

Abstract How do domestic factors influence US presidents’ decisions to lift sanctions? Drawing on work emphasizing the domestic costs related to leaders’ foreign policy decisions, I argue that a president's political capital vis-à-vis the public and Congress, as well as Congress's anticipated responses, influences when and how presidents lift sanctions. Analyzing novel data on all US sanctions imposed between 1990 and 2018 with a competing risks model, I uncover two key findings: First, presidents with stronger party power in Congress and higher public approval ratings are more likely to end sanctions, particularly by capitulation. Second, sanctions that include mechanisms of congressional oversight last longer and are less likely to be lifted by the president before achieving their goals. Interviews with US sanctions practitioners and anecdotal evidence complement these statistical findings, underscoring the role of domestic actors in shaping sanctions policy and highlighting that lifting sanctions is often harder than imposing them.

Foreign Policy AnalysisVol. 21(3)
Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE), German Institute for Global and Area Studies (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When and How Do Presidents Terminate Sanctions? The Effect of Domestic Factors on US Sanctions Policy — Hana Attia · Foreign Policy Analysis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS