AN ADVANCED REVIEW ON HUMAN ACTIVITY RECOGNITION USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Understanding human interactions and relationships requires human activity recognition (HAR).Extraction is difficult since it reveals a person's identity, personality, and mental state.Human activity movement forecasting is HAR.HAR is used in many applications since cellphones and video cameras can collect human activity data.Digital devices, apps, and AI advances have made deep learning data extraction for reliable detection and interpretation possible.This integration has strengthened our understanding of HAR's three pillars-acquisition devices, artificial intelligence, and their applications-which are expanding rapidly.While various review papers have covered the basics of HAR, few have compared all HAR devices and even fewer have examined the impact different AI designs.This assessment covers 2006-2021 and analyses HAR's three pillars.The study also suggests ways to improve HAR design for reliability and stability.Five main conclusions: (1) HAR is built on devices, AI, and apps; (2) HAR dominates the healthcare business; (3) hybrid AI models are still developing and require significant improvement to provide stable and reliable designs.Additionally, these models must have reliable predictions, high precision, effective generalisation, and the ability to achieve application objectives without bias; there has been little research on anomaly detection in human activities; and movement prediction has advanced little.The three core components of the HAR industry-electronic devices, apps, and artificial intelligence-will continue to evolve, and AI will shape the future of the sector.This paper summarises current human activity classification research.We classify human activity recognition methods and evaluate their pros and cons.Two main types of human activity classification techniques use one or more modalities.Subcategories within each category show how they represent human activities and which ones they highlight.We also exhaustively evaluate publically accessible human activity recognition datasets and ideal HAR dataset criteria.This paper highlights sensor-based and video-based human activity detection development, emphasizing on core technologies, identification systems, and applications from low-level to highlevel representations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Science Engineering Technology and Management Sciences
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63590/jsetms.2025.v02.i07.pp517-525
Primary Topic
Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AN ADVANCED REVIEW ON HUMAN ACTIVITY RECOGNITION USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Aarthi M. Reddy
Journal of Science Engineering Technology and Management Sciences
Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
article

AN ADVANCED REVIEW ON HUMAN ACTIVITY RECOGNITION USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Aarthi M. Reddy
article en

Abstract

Understanding human interactions and relationships requires human activity recognition (HAR).Extraction is difficult since it reveals a person's identity, personality, and mental state.Human activity movement forecasting is HAR.HAR is used in many applications since cellphones and video cameras can collect human activity data.Digital devices, apps, and AI advances have made deep learning data extraction for reliable detection and interpretation possible.This integration has strengthened our understanding of HAR's three pillars-acquisition devices, artificial intelligence, and their applications-which are expanding rapidly.While various review papers have covered the basics of HAR, few have compared all HAR devices and even fewer have examined the impact different AI designs.This assessment covers 2006-2021 and analyses HAR's three pillars.The study also suggests ways to improve HAR design for reliability and stability.Five main conclusions: (1) HAR is built on devices, AI, and apps; (2) HAR dominates the healthcare business; (3) hybrid AI models are still developing and require significant improvement to provide stable and reliable designs.Additionally, these models must have reliable predictions, high precision, effective generalisation, and the ability to achieve application objectives without bias; there has been little research on anomaly detection in human activities; and movement prediction has advanced little.The three core components of the HAR industry-electronic devices, apps, and artificial intelligence-will continue to evolve, and AI will shape the future of the sector.This paper summarises current human activity classification research.We classify human activity recognition methods and evaluate their pros and cons.Two main types of human activity classification techniques use one or more modalities.Subcategories within each category show how they represent human activities and which ones they highlight.We also exhaustively evaluate publically accessible human activity recognition datasets and ideal HAR dataset criteria.This paper highlights sensor-based and video-based human activity detection development, emphasizing on core technologies, identification systems, and applications from low-level to highlevel representations.

Journal of Science Engineering Technology and Management SciencesVol. 2(7)
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.