The potential of I. Lakatos’ methodology in the study of socio-political discourses

Introduction. The article outlines research positions within the framework of the study of socio-political discourse. Theoretical analysis. It is noted that socio-political discourse should be explicated as a mode (order) of communication between government and society for the purpose of developing a consensus. The study of socio-political discourses as different modes (orders) of communication between authorities and society is presented in the article based on the methodology of I. Lakatos’ research programs. The notion of a research program from Lakatos’ conception is considered coherent with the notion of socio-political discourse. In this regard, the conceptual Lakatos’ terminology is considered as a metaphor for explaining socio-political dynamics. In the description and analysis of socio-political discourses, along with the research program, such central metaphors as the metaphysical core («hard core») and the protective belt are highlighted, according to the terminology used by Lakatos. The rivalry between the socio-political discourse of liberal values and the socio-political discourse of traditional values is outlined as the main trend of the modern period. It is stated that a special feature of the discourse of liberal values is the simulacrum of the metaphysical core. Conclusion. The socio-political discourse of traditional values served as the basis for the majority consensus when adopting amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation in 2020 and, thus, became pivotal in the dynamics of the modern socio-political system of Russia.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Izvestiya of Saratov University Philosophy Psychology Pedagogy
Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2025-25-2-100-104
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The potential of I. Lakatos’ methodology in the study of socio-political discourses

Anton A. Dolmatov
Izvestiya of Saratov University Philosophy Psychology Pedagogy
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

The potential of I. Lakatos’ methodology in the study of socio-political discourses

Anton A. Dolmatov
article en

Abstract

Introduction. The article outlines research positions within the framework of the study of socio-political discourse. Theoretical analysis. It is noted that socio-political discourse should be explicated as a mode (order) of communication between government and society for the purpose of developing a consensus. The study of socio-political discourses as different modes (orders) of communication between authorities and society is presented in the article based on the methodology of I. Lakatos’ research programs. The notion of a research program from Lakatos’ conception is considered coherent with the notion of socio-political discourse. In this regard, the conceptual Lakatos’ terminology is considered as a metaphor for explaining socio-political dynamics. In the description and analysis of socio-political discourses, along with the research program, such central metaphors as the metaphysical core («hard core») and the protective belt are highlighted, according to the terminology used by Lakatos. The rivalry between the socio-political discourse of liberal values and the socio-political discourse of traditional values is outlined as the main trend of the modern period. It is stated that a special feature of the discourse of liberal values is the simulacrum of the metaphysical core. Conclusion. The socio-political discourse of traditional values served as the basis for the majority consensus when adopting amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation in 2020 and, thus, became pivotal in the dynamics of the modern socio-political system of Russia.

Izvestiya of Saratov University Philosophy Psychology PedagogyVol. 25(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.