Leveraging NLP for Semantic and Numerical Inconsistency Detection in Tax Submissions

This study presents an innovative method for identifying tax fraud through the application of natural language processing (NLP) to uncover irregularities within tax documents. Departing from conventional approaches that rely primarily on numerical analysis, the proposed framework combines domain-specific BERT embeddings with bidirectional LSTM architectures to effectively capture nuanced contextual information. A hybrid ensemble architecture is developed to process both structured data and free-text components within tax returns, facilitating the identification of semantic associations among financial entities and exposing numerical inconsistencies. The system was evaluated on a dataset comprising 15,000 tax documents, of which 8.5% were identified as fraudulent. The proposed model achieved superior performance, with an F1-score of 0.868 and an AUC of 0.931 — marking a 7.6% enhancement over leading existing models. Detection effectiveness varied by document category: individual income tax filings yielded an F1-score of 0.889, outperforming business-related filings, which scored 0.818. Further examination reveals that semantic features are particularly effective for identifying fraud in corporate tax documents, while numerical coherence indicators are more significant for personal filings. Although the approach requires higher computational resources compared to conventional techniques, its capacity to detect complex fraud schemes — especially those that disguise manipulation within textual content while maintaining plausible numeric data — offers a significant improvement to current tax fraud detection systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Engineering and Technology Proceedings
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71222/0fmphc41
Primary Topic
Data Quality and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging NLP for Semantic and Numerical Inconsistency Detection in Tax Submissions

Jintu Fan, Jiayu Liang, Xin Jing, Zhen Feng
Science Engineering and Technology Proceedings
Data Quality and Management
article

Leveraging NLP for Semantic and Numerical Inconsistency Detection in Tax Submissions

Jintu Fan, Jiayu Liang, Xin Jing, Zhen Feng
article en

Abstract

This study presents an innovative method for identifying tax fraud through the application of natural language processing (NLP) to uncover irregularities within tax documents. Departing from conventional approaches that rely primarily on numerical analysis, the proposed framework combines domain-specific BERT embeddings with bidirectional LSTM architectures to effectively capture nuanced contextual information. A hybrid ensemble architecture is developed to process both structured data and free-text components within tax returns, facilitating the identification of semantic associations among financial entities and exposing numerical inconsistencies. The system was evaluated on a dataset comprising 15,000 tax documents, of which 8.5% were identified as fraudulent. The proposed model achieved superior performance, with an F1-score of 0.868 and an AUC of 0.931 — marking a 7.6% enhancement over leading existing models. Detection effectiveness varied by document category: individual income tax filings yielded an F1-score of 0.889, outperforming business-related filings, which scored 0.818. Further examination reveals that semantic features are particularly effective for identifying fraud in corporate tax documents, while numerical coherence indicators are more significant for personal filings. Although the approach requires higher computational resources compared to conventional techniques, its capacity to detect complex fraud schemes — especially those that disguise manipulation within textual content while maintaining plausible numeric data — offers a significant improvement to current tax fraud detection systems.

Science Engineering and Technology ProceedingsVol. 1
Cornell University (US), University of Michigan (US), Madison Group (United States) (US), University of Rochester (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Data Quality and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.