Visual Justice and the Aesthetic Construction of the Trial

This article explores the concept of visual justice—the aesthetic and symbolic construction of justice in courtroom films and television—and its impact on public legal consciousness when its tropes and dynamics are used in journalistic discourse. While legal dramas do not claim to represent judicial reality, they shape cultural expectations through narrative coherence, emotional legibility, and moral clarity. As these visual tropes migrate from fiction into journalism, particularly in the phenomenon of “trial by media”, they risk distorting public understanding of how justice operates in practice. We argue that when real trials fail to align with the aesthetic script popularized by cinematic representation and inappropriately adopted in the practice of reportage, public trust in the judiciary may erode. This article bridges legal theory, media studies, and aesthetics to interrogate the ethical and epistemic consequences of representing law as image. Keywords: visual justice; legal aesthetics; trial by media; judicial representation; public perception of law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Amicus Curiae
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14296/ac.v6i3.5787
Primary Topic
Law in Society and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visual Justice and the Aesthetic Construction of the Trial

Paolo Vargiu, Arianna Careddu
Amicus Curiae
Law in Society and Culture
article

Visual Justice and the Aesthetic Construction of the Trial

Paolo Vargiu, Arianna Careddu
article en

Abstract

This article explores the concept of visual justice—the aesthetic and symbolic construction of justice in courtroom films and television—and its impact on public legal consciousness when its tropes and dynamics are used in journalistic discourse. While legal dramas do not claim to represent judicial reality, they shape cultural expectations through narrative coherence, emotional legibility, and moral clarity. As these visual tropes migrate from fiction into journalism, particularly in the phenomenon of “trial by media”, they risk distorting public understanding of how justice operates in practice. We argue that when real trials fail to align with the aesthetic script popularized by cinematic representation and inappropriately adopted in the practice of reportage, public trust in the judiciary may erode. This article bridges legal theory, media studies, and aesthetics to interrogate the ethical and epistemic consequences of representing law as image. Keywords: visual justice; legal aesthetics; trial by media; judicial representation; public perception of law.

Amicus CuriaeVol. 6(3)
University of Leicester (GB)
Università degli Studi di Cagliari, European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Law in Society and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.