Systematic Review: Comparison of Telemedicine Consultation With Face-To-Face Consultation in High-Risk Pregnant Women in the Digital Era

ABSTRACT In the digital age, telemedicine has emerged as a promising approach to healthcare delivery, particularly for high-risk pregnant women who require regular monitoring and consultation. The shift from traditional face-to-face consultations to telemedicine consultations requires evaluation of its effectiveness and impact on maternal health.The aim of this systematic review was to compare the effectiveness and impact of telemedicine consultation with face-to-face consultation on the health of high-risk pregnant women. This comparison includes aspects such as patient satisfaction, quality of service, health outcomes, and implementation barriers. A systematic review was conducted using databases including PubMed, Sage Journal, Science Direct, Wiley, and Cochrane. The search was limited to articles published in the last five years (2019-2024). Additional references were identified through manual searches. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria with a focus on high-risk pregnant women and comparison of telemedicine and face-to-face consultations. The review included studies that provided data on patient satisfaction, quality of care, health outcomes, and implementation barriers. Telemedical consultations are generally well received by patients as they offer convenience and flexibility. However, challenges such as technological barriers, internet connectivity issues, and the need for emotional support were also noted. In terms of health outcomes, telemedicine proved to be as effective as face-to-face consultations for most measures, although some aspects of the service, particularly those that require direct physical assessment, are still a challenge. Telemedical consultations offer a viable alternative to face-to-face consultations for high-risk pregnant women, providing comparable quality of care and patient satisfaction. However, successful implementation of telemedicine requires addressing technological and emotional support challenges. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are needed to understand the long-term impact of telemedicine on maternal health. Keywords: Telemedicine, Face-to-face consultation, High-Risk Pregnant Women, Digital era

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Malahayati Nursing Journal
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33024/mnj.v7i7.20875
Primary Topic
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic Review: Comparison of Telemedicine Consultation With Face-To-Face Consultation in High-Risk Pregnant Women in the Digital Era

Wahyuni Idvia Nova, Rezky Nindra, Titin Marlina, Elfrida Y.A et al.
1 links
Malahayati Nursing Journal
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
article

Systematic Review: Comparison of Telemedicine Consultation With Face-To-Face Consultation in High-Risk Pregnant Women in the Digital Era

Wahyuni Idvia Nova, Rezky Nindra, Titin Marlina, Elfrida Y.A, Mufdlilhah Mufdlilhah, Putri Listiani
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the digital age, telemedicine has emerged as a promising approach to healthcare delivery, particularly for high-risk pregnant women who require regular monitoring and consultation. The shift from traditional face-to-face consultations to telemedicine consultations requires evaluation of its effectiveness and impact on maternal health.The aim of this systematic review was to compare the effectiveness and impact of telemedicine consultation with face-to-face consultation on the health of high-risk pregnant women. This comparison includes aspects such as patient satisfaction, quality of service, health outcomes, and implementation barriers. A systematic review was conducted using databases including PubMed, Sage Journal, Science Direct, Wiley, and Cochrane. The search was limited to articles published in the last five years (2019-2024). Additional references were identified through manual searches. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria with a focus on high-risk pregnant women and comparison of telemedicine and face-to-face consultations. The review included studies that provided data on patient satisfaction, quality of care, health outcomes, and implementation barriers. Telemedical consultations are generally well received by patients as they offer convenience and flexibility. However, challenges such as technological barriers, internet connectivity issues, and the need for emotional support were also noted. In terms of health outcomes, telemedicine proved to be as effective as face-to-face consultations for most measures, although some aspects of the service, particularly those that require direct physical assessment, are still a challenge. Telemedical consultations offer a viable alternative to face-to-face consultations for high-risk pregnant women, providing comparable quality of care and patient satisfaction. However, successful implementation of telemedicine requires addressing technological and emotional support challenges. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are needed to understand the long-term impact of telemedicine on maternal health. Keywords: Telemedicine, Face-to-face consultation, High-Risk Pregnant Women, Digital era

Malahayati Nursing JournalVol. 7(7)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.