Development and assessment of HCI reflect: an HCI practice process self-assessment model

Abstract Many software development companies, especially small and medium-sized ones, still need to be more aware of and understand Human–Computer Interaction (HCI) values, methods, techniques, and concepts. Recent studies have shown that companies are demanding internal self-assessment of HCI practices within the software development industry. However, only a few models are available for assessing HCI practices, and they lack sufficient validation to be widely applicable. The models are mainly based on staged assessments by experts, but continuous representation models are more suitable for self-assessment. To bridge these gaps, we have developed a new process model, HCI Reflect—a self-assessment method, and structurally assessed it as a model encompassing four dimensions for self-assessing HCI practices in software development companies: human-centeredness, process and infrastructure, usability performance, and usability impact. In this article, we present the model’s theoretical foundation and the results from an international assessment study of the first version of the model, where 118 software development professionals evaluated the model’s four dimensions. The results demonstrated the significance of these dimensions, and based on this, we present a revised version. The development and assessment are the first steps towards the validation of the model, and we plan to test the underlying questionnaire for usability next. The model, when validated, would be helpful for self-assessing HCI practices in software development companies to foster knowledge and understanding of HCI practices in development teams. ACM CCS: Human-centered computing— > Human computer interaction (HCI)— > HCI design and evaluation methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Interacting with Computers
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwaf035
Primary Topic
Usability and User Interface Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and assessment of HCI reflect: an HCI practice process self-assessment model

David Lamas, Abiodun Afolayan Ogunyemi, Marta Lárusdóttir
Interacting with Computers
Usability and User Interface Design
article

Development and assessment of HCI reflect: an HCI practice process self-assessment model

David Lamas, Abiodun Afolayan Ogunyemi, Marta Lárusdóttir
article en

Abstract

Abstract Many software development companies, especially small and medium-sized ones, still need to be more aware of and understand Human–Computer Interaction (HCI) values, methods, techniques, and concepts. Recent studies have shown that companies are demanding internal self-assessment of HCI practices within the software development industry. However, only a few models are available for assessing HCI practices, and they lack sufficient validation to be widely applicable. The models are mainly based on staged assessments by experts, but continuous representation models are more suitable for self-assessment. To bridge these gaps, we have developed a new process model, HCI Reflect—a self-assessment method, and structurally assessed it as a model encompassing four dimensions for self-assessing HCI practices in software development companies: human-centeredness, process and infrastructure, usability performance, and usability impact. In this article, we present the model’s theoretical foundation and the results from an international assessment study of the first version of the model, where 118 software development professionals evaluated the model’s four dimensions. The results demonstrated the significance of these dimensions, and based on this, we present a revised version. The development and assessment are the first steps towards the validation of the model, and we plan to test the underlying questionnaire for usability next. The model, when validated, would be helpful for self-assessing HCI practices in software development companies to foster knowledge and understanding of HCI practices in development teams. ACM CCS: Human-centered computing— > Human computer interaction (HCI)— > HCI design and evaluation methods.

Interacting with Computers
Reykjavík University (IS), Tallinn University (EE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Usability and User Interface Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.