Pro-Social Entrepreneurship and Social Impact. A Problematizing Literature Review

Research on social impact in pro-social entrepreneurship has been shaped by implicit assumptions that constrain its conceptual and empirical development. In this paper, we adopt a problematizing literature review, as developed by Alvesson and Sandberg (2020), to critically examine the foundations of social impact research in the field of social and sustainable entrepreneurship. Drawing on perspectives from sociology and anthropology, we identify two dominant assumptions and their consequences for research practices and propose a few new perspectives to the study of social impact in the field of entrepreneurship. First, we highlight that a founder-funder perspective dominates the literature. By adopting this perspective, researchers have prioritized venture and investor views while neglecting the agency of beneficiaries in shaping and experiencing social outcomes. Second, we challenge the predominant treatment of social impact measurement as an objective and neutral process, emphasizing its performative nature—how measurement practices actively shape the outcomes they seek to assess.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academy of Management Proceedings
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5465/amproc.2025.3bp
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pro-Social Entrepreneurship and Social Impact. A Problematizing Literature Review

Alessia Argiolas, Frank‐Martin Belz
Academy of Management Proceedings
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
article

Pro-Social Entrepreneurship and Social Impact. A Problematizing Literature Review

Alessia Argiolas, Frank‐Martin Belz
article en

Abstract

Research on social impact in pro-social entrepreneurship has been shaped by implicit assumptions that constrain its conceptual and empirical development. In this paper, we adopt a problematizing literature review, as developed by Alvesson and Sandberg (2020), to critically examine the foundations of social impact research in the field of social and sustainable entrepreneurship. Drawing on perspectives from sociology and anthropology, we identify two dominant assumptions and their consequences for research practices and propose a few new perspectives to the study of social impact in the field of entrepreneurship. First, we highlight that a founder-funder perspective dominates the literature. By adopting this perspective, researchers have prioritized venture and investor views while neglecting the agency of beneficiaries in shaping and experiencing social outcomes. Second, we challenge the predominant treatment of social impact measurement as an objective and neutral process, emphasizing its performative nature—how measurement practices actively shape the outcomes they seek to assess.

Academy of Management ProceedingsVol. 2025(1)
Technical University of Munich (DE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pro-Social Entrepreneurship and Social Impact. A Problematizing Literature Review — Alessia Argiolas, Frank‐Martin Belz · Academy of Management Proceedings (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS