Best-Worst Method based Smart Cities Sustainable Development Paths

Smart cities utilize advanced information technology to optimize urban operations, aiming to improve efficiency, sustainability, and resident well-being. While big data and algorithms have significant potential to inform decision-making, traditional evaluation methods often fail to accurately assess smart city performance indicators, limiting sustainable development. To address this limitation, our study applies the Best-Worst Method (BWM) to enhance the assessment of smart city indicators. Through a literature review and expert consultation, we identified five major obstacles to smart city development. Using BWM, we established the weights of these obstacles, identifying inadequate traffic management systems, limited public transportation coverage, poor satisfaction with online government services, and insufficient attraction of skilled talent as the most critical factors. By employing BWM, urban planners and policymakers can better identify essential evaluation indicators, facilitating more efficient resource allocation and informed decision-making. This approach offers a foundation for intelligent forecasting and development, ensuring that smart cities meet the evolving and complex needs of urban residents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iucc65928.2024.00107
Primary Topic
Smart Cities and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Best-Worst Method based Smart Cities Sustainable Development Paths

Yanmei Liu, Shih‐Heng Yu, Jingshuo Li, Bo Yuan et al.
Smart Cities and Technologies
article

Best-Worst Method based Smart Cities Sustainable Development Paths

Yanmei Liu, Shih‐Heng Yu, Jingshuo Li, Bo Yuan, Weijia Wu, Kang Chen, Xuan Jia, Fuyun Chu
article en

Abstract

Smart cities utilize advanced information technology to optimize urban operations, aiming to improve efficiency, sustainability, and resident well-being. While big data and algorithms have significant potential to inform decision-making, traditional evaluation methods often fail to accurately assess smart city performance indicators, limiting sustainable development. To address this limitation, our study applies the Best-Worst Method (BWM) to enhance the assessment of smart city indicators. Through a literature review and expert consultation, we identified five major obstacles to smart city development. Using BWM, we established the weights of these obstacles, identifying inadequate traffic management systems, limited public transportation coverage, poor satisfaction with online government services, and insufficient attraction of skilled talent as the most critical factors. By employing BWM, urban planners and policymakers can better identify essential evaluation indicators, facilitating more efficient resource allocation and informed decision-making. This approach offers a foundation for intelligent forecasting and development, ensuring that smart cities meet the evolving and complex needs of urban residents.

China Academy of Information and Communications Technology (CN), China Electronics Standardization Institute (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Smart Cities and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Best-Worst Method based Smart Cities Sustainable Development Paths — Yanmei Liu, Shih‐Heng Yu, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS