Solving Inverse Problems with Deep Learning

Many electromagnetic design problems can be cast as an inverse problem. That is, one may specify a desired scattering state and seek to find the ideal configuration of an antenna, waveguide, power amplifier, and related constituent materials and geometry needed to achieve the goal. However, inverse problems are a long standing and challenging problem in physics and engineering and many electromagnetic design problems suffer from ill-posedness. Recently deep learning has been used to tackle ill-posed inverse design, and many novel results have been demonstrated. We overview and benchmark several deep inverse methods and use two metrics to characterize their performance - inference speed and accuracy of solutions. Deep inverse methods are benchmarked against three electromagnetics problems and a discussion of Hadamard's well posed criteria is used as a point of discussion for the future of this exciting field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23919/aces66556.2025.11052472
Primary Topic
Neural Networks and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Solving Inverse Problems with Deep Learning

Jordan M. Malof, Simiao Ren, Willie J. Padilla, Yang Deng
Neural Networks and Applications
article

Solving Inverse Problems with Deep Learning

Jordan M. Malof, Simiao Ren, Willie J. Padilla, Yang Deng
article en

Abstract

Many electromagnetic design problems can be cast as an inverse problem. That is, one may specify a desired scattering state and seek to find the ideal configuration of an antenna, waveguide, power amplifier, and related constituent materials and geometry needed to achieve the goal. However, inverse problems are a long standing and challenging problem in physics and engineering and many electromagnetic design problems suffer from ill-posedness. Recently deep learning has been used to tackle ill-posed inverse design, and many novel results have been demonstrated. We overview and benchmark several deep inverse methods and use two metrics to characterize their performance - inference speed and accuracy of solutions. Deep inverse methods are benchmarked against three electromagnetics problems and a discussion of Hadamard's well posed criteria is used as a point of discussion for the future of this exciting field.

Duke University (US), University of Missouri (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Neural Networks and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.