FOAM 02: A dataset of impedance tube measurements with different materials and diameter variations

Impedance tube measurements are a widespread method for determining the sound absorption coefficient (SAC) of porous materials for normal sound incidence. The measurement method is standardised in ISO 10534-2. However, the standards offer limited guidance on sample preparation and mounting. Many impedance tubes have a circular cross-section and can be mounted at various angles. Therefore, it is crucial to investigate the influence of the mounting angle on the SAC and its interaction with diameter imperfections and different thicknesses using different materials. Following the dataset FOAM 01 this work documents the creation of a new dataset (called FOAM 02 ) containing SAC measurements from the ISO 10534-2 two-microphone method. The following factors are considered: two different materials, four thicknesses, three diameters, and four rotation angles. For each combination of material, thickness, and diameter, three specimens are produced, resulting in 72 specimens. Each specimen is measured three times at each rotation angle, yielding 864 SAC measurements. The dataset contains the SAC measurements and one-hot encoded label vectors, and is publicly available. A cutting device is proposed to saw cylindrical specimens accurately on a band saw with variable thickness and diameter. The workshop drawings of the cutting device are available as supplementary material.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Acustica
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2025033
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geophysical Methods and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FOAM 02: A dataset of impedance tube measurements with different materials and diameter variations

Alfonso Caiazzo, Manfred Kaltenbacher, Giuseppe Petrone, Stefan Schoder et al.
1 citations
Acta Acustica
Geophysical Methods and Applications
1.15
article

FOAM 02: A dataset of impedance tube measurements with different materials and diameter variations

Alfonso Caiazzo, Manfred Kaltenbacher, Giuseppe Petrone, Stefan Schoder, Florian Kraxberger, Christian Adams, Sergio De Rosa, Andreas Wurzinger, Jan Boysen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Impedance tube measurements are a widespread method for determining the sound absorption coefficient (SAC) of porous materials for normal sound incidence. The measurement method is standardised in ISO 10534-2. However, the standards offer limited guidance on sample preparation and mounting. Many impedance tubes have a circular cross-section and can be mounted at various angles. Therefore, it is crucial to investigate the influence of the mounting angle on the SAC and its interaction with diameter imperfections and different thicknesses using different materials. Following the dataset FOAM 01 this work documents the creation of a new dataset (called FOAM 02 ) containing SAC measurements from the ISO 10534-2 two-microphone method. The following factors are considered: two different materials, four thicknesses, three diameters, and four rotation angles. For each combination of material, thickness, and diameter, three specimens are produced, resulting in 72 specimens. Each specimen is measured three times at each rotation angle, yielding 864 SAC measurements. The dataset contains the SAC measurements and one-hot encoded label vectors, and is publicly available. A cutting device is proposed to saw cylindrical specimens accurately on a band saw with variable thickness and diameter. The workshop drawings of the cutting device are available as supplementary material.

Acta AcusticaVol. 9
TU Graz, Internationale Beziehungen und Mobilitätsprogramme, Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft, Amt der Steiermärkischen Landesregierung
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Geophysical Methods and Applications
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.