The Perceptions of Senior International Officers on Internationalization Strategies at Research Universities

This dissertation utilized semi-structured interviews with 15 Senior International Officers at U.S. research universities to interrogate three institutional issues: 1) motivations for internationalization, 2) strategies for internationalization, and 3) leadership for internationalization. Through inductive data analysis, the first finding uses globalization theory to explore how SIO’s navigate the tension between global collaboration and competition, serving as both mission stewards and strategic advisors within research universities. The second finding utilizes contingency theory to depict how internationalization is a driver of mobility, cross-cultural learning, and global integration, yet often disrupts institutional norms, introduces unfamiliar ideas, and challenges the status quo. The third finding draws upon intellectual leadership theory to detail how SIOs navigate institutional structures, leadership expectations, and external pressure to advance global engagement. Overall, findings underscore the need for adaptive leadership and collaborative governance during a time of significant disruption in U.S. higher education.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32674/9gxb0c97
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Perceptions of Senior International Officers on Internationalization Strategies at Research Universities

Iyonka Strawn-Valcy
Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

The Perceptions of Senior International Officers on Internationalization Strategies at Research Universities

Iyonka Strawn-Valcy
article en

Abstract

This dissertation utilized semi-structured interviews with 15 Senior International Officers at U.S. research universities to interrogate three institutional issues: 1) motivations for internationalization, 2) strategies for internationalization, and 3) leadership for internationalization. Through inductive data analysis, the first finding uses globalization theory to explore how SIO’s navigate the tension between global collaboration and competition, serving as both mission stewards and strategic advisors within research universities. The second finding utilizes contingency theory to depict how internationalization is a driver of mobility, cross-cultural learning, and global integration, yet often disrupts institutional norms, introduces unfamiliar ideas, and challenges the status quo. The third finding draws upon intellectual leadership theory to detail how SIOs navigate institutional structures, leadership expectations, and external pressure to advance global engagement. Overall, findings underscore the need for adaptive leadership and collaborative governance during a time of significant disruption in U.S. higher education.

Journal of Comparative & International Higher EducationVol. 17(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Perceptions of Senior International Officers on Internationalization Strategies at Research Universities — Iyonka Strawn-Valcy · Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS