Melancholia and its theopolitical discontents

English-born philosopher and sociologist Gillian Rose (1947-1995) and French Trotskyist activist and philosopher Daniel Bensaïd (1946-2010) were born a mere year apart. While their work departs from the respective strands of Western Marxism and its focus on aesthetics and philosophy versus a Trotskyist preoccupation with economics and politics, they both were interested in Walter Benjamin and his ideas of messianism, melancholy, and Judaism in the early nineties. This article argues that Rose and Bensaïd’s heterodox Jewish identities in their respective memoirs parallel their Jewish-inflected dialectical containers for Benjamin’s melancholy. It effectively stages imagined fictive meeting between the two thinkers in which they discuss their disagreements about Benjamin as melancholically politically disengaged (Rose) or revitalizing Marxism through a melancholy messianic wager (Bensaïd).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordisk Judaistik/Scandinavian Jewish Studies
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30752/nj.154730
Primary Topic
Race, History, and American Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Melancholia and its theopolitical discontents

Rachel Pafe
Nordisk Judaistik/Scandinavian Jewish Studies
Race, History, and American Society
article

Melancholia and its theopolitical discontents

Rachel Pafe
article en

Abstract

English-born philosopher and sociologist Gillian Rose (1947-1995) and French Trotskyist activist and philosopher Daniel Bensaïd (1946-2010) were born a mere year apart. While their work departs from the respective strands of Western Marxism and its focus on aesthetics and philosophy versus a Trotskyist preoccupation with economics and politics, they both were interested in Walter Benjamin and his ideas of messianism, melancholy, and Judaism in the early nineties. This article argues that Rose and Bensaïd’s heterodox Jewish identities in their respective memoirs parallel their Jewish-inflected dialectical containers for Benjamin’s melancholy. It effectively stages imagined fictive meeting between the two thinkers in which they discuss their disagreements about Benjamin as melancholically politically disengaged (Rose) or revitalizing Marxism through a melancholy messianic wager (Bensaïd).

Nordisk Judaistik/Scandinavian Jewish StudiesVol. 36(1)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Race, History, and American Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.