Louisa May Alcott’s Pets

Pet keeping first became a popular way of life among Americans in the nineteenth century. Across the span of the century, texts for children actively participated in the shaping of pet keeping culture by instructing the next generation on how humans might best engage with domesticated nonhuman animals. This essay sheds light on Louisa May Alcott’s participation in this history by examining a number of her pet stories for children, all of which raise serious questions about the ethics involved in pet keeping. Specifically, Alcott’s “Cocky Twitters” (1874), “Buzz” (1868), “Huckleberry” (1873), and Under the Lilacs (1878) provide space for readers to reflect on how pet keeping affects the animals themselves, and to consider the obligations of humans who seek to make a pet out of an animal. In varying degrees, these texts both reveal and express apprehension toward the anthropocentric nature of pet keeping; in these stories, the practice often benefits humans at the expense of their pets.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of American Studies
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22505/jas.2025.57.1.02
Primary Topic
Media, Gender, and Advertising
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Louisa May Alcott’s Pets

Dohyun Shin
Journal of American Studies
Media, Gender, and Advertising
article

Louisa May Alcott’s Pets

Dohyun Shin
article en

Abstract

Pet keeping first became a popular way of life among Americans in the nineteenth century. Across the span of the century, texts for children actively participated in the shaping of pet keeping culture by instructing the next generation on how humans might best engage with domesticated nonhuman animals. This essay sheds light on Louisa May Alcott’s participation in this history by examining a number of her pet stories for children, all of which raise serious questions about the ethics involved in pet keeping. Specifically, Alcott’s “Cocky Twitters” (1874), “Buzz” (1868), “Huckleberry” (1873), and Under the Lilacs (1878) provide space for readers to reflect on how pet keeping affects the animals themselves, and to consider the obligations of humans who seek to make a pet out of an animal. In varying degrees, these texts both reveal and express apprehension toward the anthropocentric nature of pet keeping; in these stories, the practice often benefits humans at the expense of their pets.

Journal of American StudiesVol. 57(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Media, Gender, and Advertising
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.