Know Your Limits: A Survey of Abstention in Large Language Models

Abstract Abstention, the refusal of large language models (LLMs) to provide an answer, is increasingly recognized for its potential to mitigate hallucinations and enhance safety in LLM systems. In this survey, we introduce a framework to examine abstention from three perspectives: the query, the model, and human values. We organize the literature on abstention methods, benchmarks, and evaluation metrics using this framework, and discuss merits and limitations of prior work. We further identify and motivate areas for future research, such as whether abstention can be achieved as a meta-capability that transcends specific tasks or domains, and opportunities to optimize abstention abilities in specific contexts. In doing so, we aim to broaden the scope and impact of abstention methodologies in AI systems.1

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00754
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Know Your Limits: A Survey of Abstention in Large Language Models

Shangbin Feng, Yulia Tsvetkov, Lucy Lu Wang, Jihan Yao et al.
9 citations
Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Topic Modeling
19.85
article

Know Your Limits: A Survey of Abstention in Large Language Models

Shangbin Feng, Yulia Tsvetkov, Lucy Lu Wang, Jihan Yao, Bingbing Wen, Chenjun Xu, Bill Howe
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Abstract Abstention, the refusal of large language models (LLMs) to provide an answer, is increasingly recognized for its potential to mitigate hallucinations and enhance safety in LLM systems. In this survey, we introduce a framework to examine abstention from three perspectives: the query, the model, and human values. We organize the literature on abstention methods, benchmarks, and evaluation metrics using this framework, and discuss merits and limitations of prior work. We further identify and motivate areas for future research, such as whether abstention can be achieved as a meta-capability that transcends specific tasks or domains, and opportunities to optimize abstention abilities in specific contexts. In doing so, we aim to broaden the scope and impact of abstention methodologies in AI systems.1

Transactions of the Association for Computational LinguisticsVol. 13
University of Washington (US), Allen Institute (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Advanced Research Projects Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Topic Modeling
19.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Know Your Limits: A Survey of Abstention in Large Language Models — Shangbin Feng, Yulia Tsvetkov, et al. · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS