Comparative Study Between Suture Button Versus Syndesmotic Screw Fixation in Acute Syndesmotic Ankle Injury

Abstract Aim: To evaluate the outcomes of the patients of all ages with ankle sprain treated with a suture button and compare it to patients with syndesmotic screw fixation and compare the radiologic and functional outcomes of patients treated with a suture button with syndesmotic screw fixation. Materials and Methods: This study adopts a prospective comparative design to assess the efficacy of two surgical interventions—suture button fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation in managing acute syndesmotic ankle injuries. Forty-two patients diagnosed with acute syndesmotic ankle injuries at Tezpur Medical College and Hospital participated in this study. The sample were selected consecutively from October 2022 to September 2023 based on predefined inclusion criteria. Randomisation was conducted using computer-generated lists to assign patients to either Group 1 (suture button fixation) or Group 2 (syndesmotic screw fixation). Results: The distribution of suture button fixation and syndesmotic screws across different age groups in this study highlights interesting trends and preferences in the treatment of syndesmotic injuries. Among patients aged 21–40 years, the majority received suture button fixation (66.7%), which might suggest a perceived advantage of this method in younger adults. The distribution of interventions for Weber B fractures in this study suggests a slight preference for syndesmotic screw fixation, with 57.1% of patients receiving screws and 42.9% treated with suture buttons. The higher mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score of 91.2 in the suture button group compared to 87.5 in the syndesmotic screw group suggests that the treatment with suture button may result in better functional outcomes. Conclusion: Suture button fixation provides certain advantages over syndesmotic screws, including lower rates of implant failure and removal, as well as slightly better functional outcomes based on the AOFAS scores. These benefits highlight the potential of suture button fixation as a more reliable and effective treatment option for maintaining syndesmotic stability and facilitating patient recovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijors.ijors_4_25
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study Between Suture Button Versus Syndesmotic Screw Fixation in Acute Syndesmotic Ankle Injury

Chinmoy Das, Washim Akram
International Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Foot and Ankle Surgery
article

Comparative Study Between Suture Button Versus Syndesmotic Screw Fixation in Acute Syndesmotic Ankle Injury

Chinmoy Das, Washim Akram
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aim: To evaluate the outcomes of the patients of all ages with ankle sprain treated with a suture button and compare it to patients with syndesmotic screw fixation and compare the radiologic and functional outcomes of patients treated with a suture button with syndesmotic screw fixation. Materials and Methods: This study adopts a prospective comparative design to assess the efficacy of two surgical interventions—suture button fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation in managing acute syndesmotic ankle injuries. Forty-two patients diagnosed with acute syndesmotic ankle injuries at Tezpur Medical College and Hospital participated in this study. The sample were selected consecutively from October 2022 to September 2023 based on predefined inclusion criteria. Randomisation was conducted using computer-generated lists to assign patients to either Group 1 (suture button fixation) or Group 2 (syndesmotic screw fixation). Results: The distribution of suture button fixation and syndesmotic screws across different age groups in this study highlights interesting trends and preferences in the treatment of syndesmotic injuries. Among patients aged 21–40 years, the majority received suture button fixation (66.7%), which might suggest a perceived advantage of this method in younger adults. The distribution of interventions for Weber B fractures in this study suggests a slight preference for syndesmotic screw fixation, with 57.1% of patients receiving screws and 42.9% treated with suture buttons. The higher mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score of 91.2 in the suture button group compared to 87.5 in the syndesmotic screw group suggests that the treatment with suture button may result in better functional outcomes. Conclusion: Suture button fixation provides certain advantages over syndesmotic screws, including lower rates of implant failure and removal, as well as slightly better functional outcomes based on the AOFAS scores. These benefits highlight the potential of suture button fixation as a more reliable and effective treatment option for maintaining syndesmotic stability and facilitating patient recovery.

International Journal of Orthopaedic SurgeryVol. 33(1)
Tezpur Medical College & Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.