Proportionality vs. legalism

The rule of law is fundamentally anchored in the legality of state actions, ensures that state bodies operate within the legal frames. The interplay between legality and proportionality is crucial, as the legality test assesses whether actions are lawful, while the proportionality test evaluates the balance of interests involved. Together, these principles create an actual scope of individual autonomy against the potential overreach of state power, emphasizing the importance of justice based on individual rights rather than majority interests. The principles of legalism and proportionality are coherent in the task to limit state power and protect individual rights. While legalism provides a formal structure for governance, proportionality ensures that any limitations on rights are justified and balanced against the need to protect individual autonomy. The relationship between these principles is essential for maintaining a just legal order, where the protection of individual rights is prioritized, and the potential for political influence in judicial decisions is minimized. This coherence is vital for fostering a legal culture that respects individual freedoms while ensuring that state actions remain within lawful bounds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Undecidabilities and Law
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14195/2184-9781_4_4
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proportionality vs. legalism

Milena Korycka-Zirk
Undecidabilities and Law
Political Philosophy and Ethics
article

Proportionality vs. legalism

Milena Korycka-Zirk
article en

Abstract

The rule of law is fundamentally anchored in the legality of state actions, ensures that state bodies operate within the legal frames. The interplay between legality and proportionality is crucial, as the legality test assesses whether actions are lawful, while the proportionality test evaluates the balance of interests involved. Together, these principles create an actual scope of individual autonomy against the potential overreach of state power, emphasizing the importance of justice based on individual rights rather than majority interests. The principles of legalism and proportionality are coherent in the task to limit state power and protect individual rights. While legalism provides a formal structure for governance, proportionality ensures that any limitations on rights are justified and balanced against the need to protect individual autonomy. The relationship between these principles is essential for maintaining a just legal order, where the protection of individual rights is prioritized, and the potential for political influence in judicial decisions is minimized. This coherence is vital for fostering a legal culture that respects individual freedoms while ensuring that state actions remain within lawful bounds.

Undecidabilities and Law(4)
Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.