Comparative Study of Sentiment Analysis Techniques: Traditional Machine Learning vs. Deep Learning Approaches

Aim/Purpose This paper presents a comparative analysis of sentiment classification models, focusing on the performance differences between lexicon-based sentiment analysis, traditional machine learning techniques, and transformer-based deep learning approaches across multiple benchmark datasets. Background While numerous methods exist for sentiment analysis, a systematic comparison across modeling paradigms and datasets remains limited. This study addresses this gap by evaluating representative models on IMDB, Yelp Polarity, and Amazon Polarity datasets using unified metrics and preprocessing pipelines. Methodology The evaluation includes (a) VADER as a lexicon-based baseline, (b) Logistic Regression, Decision Tree and Naive Bayes models built on three types of features: Bag of Words, TF-IDF, and Word2Vec as the traditional machine learning alternatives, and (c) two transformer models, Distil-BERT-SST-2 and RoBERTa-Sentiment, without fine-tuning as the deep learning methods. Performance is assessed using Accuracy, Precision, Re-call, and F1 Score. Contribution This study offers a comprehensive, side-by-side comparison of conventional and modern sentiment classification techniques, identifying model-feature synergies and highlighting limitations in generalizability across the domains. Findings Test results show that VADER, although efficient, underperforms on complex texts. Traditional models particularly Logistic Regression paired with TF-IDF yield strong performance. Recommendations for Practitioners DistilBERT demonstrates superior performance across all datasets, while RoBERTa’s performance suffers due to domain mismatch. Recommendations for Researchers When computational resources are constrained, TF-IDF with Logistic Regression offers a competitive alternative to deep learning. For best performance, transformer models like DistilBERT should be prioritized. Impact on Society The study can improve applications in customer feedback systems, social media monitoring, and public opinion analysis, contributing to more responsive and adaptive services. Future Research Future work should explore domain-specific fine-tuning strategies and evaluate multilingual sentiment performance, especially for transformer models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Informing Science and IT Education Conference
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.28945/5490
Primary Topic
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Sentiment Analysis Techniques: Traditional Machine Learning vs. Deep Learning Approaches

Philip Obiorah, Grace Oluchi Diri, Hongbo Du
Informing Science and IT Education Conference
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
article

Comparative Study of Sentiment Analysis Techniques: Traditional Machine Learning vs. Deep Learning Approaches

Philip Obiorah, Grace Oluchi Diri, Hongbo Du
article en

Abstract

Aim/Purpose This paper presents a comparative analysis of sentiment classification models, focusing on the performance differences between lexicon-based sentiment analysis, traditional machine learning techniques, and transformer-based deep learning approaches across multiple benchmark datasets. Background While numerous methods exist for sentiment analysis, a systematic comparison across modeling paradigms and datasets remains limited. This study addresses this gap by evaluating representative models on IMDB, Yelp Polarity, and Amazon Polarity datasets using unified metrics and preprocessing pipelines. Methodology The evaluation includes (a) VADER as a lexicon-based baseline, (b) Logistic Regression, Decision Tree and Naive Bayes models built on three types of features: Bag of Words, TF-IDF, and Word2Vec as the traditional machine learning alternatives, and (c) two transformer models, Distil-BERT-SST-2 and RoBERTa-Sentiment, without fine-tuning as the deep learning methods. Performance is assessed using Accuracy, Precision, Re-call, and F1 Score. Contribution This study offers a comprehensive, side-by-side comparison of conventional and modern sentiment classification techniques, identifying model-feature synergies and highlighting limitations in generalizability across the domains. Findings Test results show that VADER, although efficient, underperforms on complex texts. Traditional models particularly Logistic Regression paired with TF-IDF yield strong performance. Recommendations for Practitioners DistilBERT demonstrates superior performance across all datasets, while RoBERTa’s performance suffers due to domain mismatch. Recommendations for Researchers When computational resources are constrained, TF-IDF with Logistic Regression offers a competitive alternative to deep learning. For best performance, transformer models like DistilBERT should be prioritized. Impact on Society The study can improve applications in customer feedback systems, social media monitoring, and public opinion analysis, contributing to more responsive and adaptive services. Future Research Future work should explore domain-specific fine-tuning strategies and evaluate multilingual sentiment performance, especially for transformer models.

Informing Science and IT Education Conference
University of Buckingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.