Psychometric Properties of the Latvian LPFS‐SR in Clinical and Nonclinical Samples

This study examines the psychometric properties of the Latvian adaptation of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Self Report (LPFS-SR) and its alignment with the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD). A clinical sample (N = 142) and a nonclinical sample (N = 306) were formed. Internal consistency, factor structure, and criterion validity were assessed to evaluate the scale's psychometric properties. Confirmatory factor analysis compared five structural models: one-factor, two-factor, four-factor, higher order, and bifactor. The bifactor model demonstrated the best fit, capturing both general and subscale-specific variance in personality functioning. Correlation and regression analyses explored associations between the LPFS-SR and the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). The findings support the Latvian LPFS-SR as a valid and reliable tool for assessing personality functioning and are consistent with the principles of the AMPD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Mental Health
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.70028
Primary Topic
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric Properties of the Latvian LPFS‐SR in Clinical and Nonclinical Samples

Ieva Stokenberga, Evija Strika, Adriana Zagórska, Agrita Briede et al.
Personality and Mental Health
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
article

Psychometric Properties of the Latvian LPFS‐SR in Clinical and Nonclinical Samples

Ieva Stokenberga, Evija Strika, Adriana Zagórska, Agrita Briede, Ksenija Vasiļjeva
article en

Abstract

This study examines the psychometric properties of the Latvian adaptation of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Self Report (LPFS-SR) and its alignment with the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD). A clinical sample (N = 142) and a nonclinical sample (N = 306) were formed. Internal consistency, factor structure, and criterion validity were assessed to evaluate the scale's psychometric properties. Confirmatory factor analysis compared five structural models: one-factor, two-factor, four-factor, higher order, and bifactor. The bifactor model demonstrated the best fit, capturing both general and subscale-specific variance in personality functioning. Correlation and regression analyses explored associations between the LPFS-SR and the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). The findings support the Latvian LPFS-SR as a valid and reliable tool for assessing personality functioning and are consistent with the principles of the AMPD.

Personality and Mental HealthVol. 19(3)
University of Latvia (LV)
Latvijas Universitate
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Psychometric Properties of the Latvian LPFS‐SR in Clinical and Nonclinical Samples — Ieva Stokenberga, Evija Strika, et al. · Personality and Mental Health (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS