[Impact of China's Environmental Regulations on CO<sub>2</sub> Emissions in the Power Sector].
CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from the power sector are the main source of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in China, and environmental regulation plays an irreplaceable role as a basic constraint for reducing carbon emissions. Based on China's provincial panel data from 2003-2019, this study analyzes the spatio-temporal characteristics of different types of environmental regulatory intensity and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from the power sector by using kernel density estimation and standard deviation ellipses. Then, the geographically and temporally weighted regression model is constructed to explore the impacts of command-based, market-based, and voluntary environmental regulations on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in the power industry. The results showed the following: ① For different types of environmental regulation: in time, the market-based environmental regulation kernel density curves showed a "rightward" motion, with interregional differences expanding, while command-based and voluntary environmental regulation showed a shrinking interregional difference; in space, command-based environmental regulation gradually followed a northwest-southeast spatial distribution pattern. Market-based and voluntary environmental regulation all showed a northeast-southwest spatial distribution pattern. ② For CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from the power sector: in time, kernel density curves showed a "rightward" motion, with inter-regional differences expanding; in space, there was a gradual pattern of northwest-southeast spatial distribution pattern, and the center of gravity was moving to the northwest. ③ The impact of different types of environmental regulations on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in the power sector had obvious spatial and temporal heterogeneity. In time, the regression coefficient of command-based environmental regulation in most provinces (cities, autonomous regions) had an increasing and subsequently declining trend, while market-based and voluntary environmental regulation decreased first and then increased. In space, spatial heterogeneity in the role of the three types of environmental regulation was evident; command-based environmental regulation gradually had a greater impact on the northern provinces (facilitation), market-based environmental regulation had a greater impact on the central-eastern provinces (facilitation), and voluntary environmental regulation had a greater impact on the eastern provinces (disincentive).
Authors
- Wei Shi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0378-8361)
- Yali Zheng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0359-2799)
- Weijuan Wang
- Ping Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9485-7325)
Institutions
- Northwest Normal University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PubMed
- Published
- 2025-06-08
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202404110
- Primary Topic
- Environmental Policies and Emissions
- Type
- article