Early Post-Operative Outcomes in Closure and Non-Closure of Peritoneum in Open Appendicectomy for Uncomplicated Appendicitis.

Open appendicectomy remains a common surgical procedure for managing uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Traditionally, peritoneal closure has been performed to restore anatomical layers, but this practice has been questioned due to its potential impact on surgical duration, postoperative pain and recovery outcomes. This study aims to compare early postoperative outcomes between peritoneal closure and non-closure techniques in patients undergoing open appendicectomy. This prospective comparative study was conducted at Mymensingh Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh, from July 2021 to June 2022, including 80 patients undergoing open appendicectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Patients were divided into Group I (peritoneal closure) and Group II (peritoneal non-closure).Data were processed and analyzed using the computer software SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 26.0 for Windows). The probability value, p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. There was no significant difference in age, sex, BMI, or comorbidities between the groups. Most procedures used a Grid Iron incision (67.5%). Wound infection (22.5%, 17.5% respectively) and wound dehiscence (7.5%, 2.5% respectively) rates were almost similar, with no significant differences (p=0.576 and p=0.305, respectively). However, Group II had significantly lower postoperative wound pain (p<0.001), reduced analgesic requirements (p<0.001) and shorter surgery duration (p<0.001) compared to Group I, demonstrating the potential benefits of omitting peritoneal closure in appendicectomy. It is concluded that non-closure of the peritoneum at open appendicectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis appears to have no adverse effect on post-operative recovery and outcome. Leaving the peritoneum open seems to reduce the operating time and shorter hospital stays. It also decreases post-operative pain with less analgesic requirement. Hence, the practice of non-closure of peritoneum in open appendicectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis can be done safely.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2025-07-01
Primary Topic
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early Post-Operative Outcomes in Closure and Non-Closure of Peritoneum in Open Appendicectomy for Uncomplicated Appendicitis.

Md. Abul Kalam Azad, Md Waliul Islam, K R Hoque, Nabarun Biswas et al.
PubMed
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
article

Early Post-Operative Outcomes in Closure and Non-Closure of Peritoneum in Open Appendicectomy for Uncomplicated Appendicitis.

Md. Abul Kalam Azad, Md Waliul Islam, K R Hoque, Nabarun Biswas, M A Baten, Mahir Anjum Anon, I Jahan, Sharif Hasan, Fahim Foysal Kollol, Md. Abdullah Al Mamun, N Islam, Mahedi Afroz Shakil, M M Hossain, M A Uddin, Mursel Mashruh, Tamanna Rahman Shanta, A H M Sufiyan
article en

Abstract

Open appendicectomy remains a common surgical procedure for managing uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Traditionally, peritoneal closure has been performed to restore anatomical layers, but this practice has been questioned due to its potential impact on surgical duration, postoperative pain and recovery outcomes. This study aims to compare early postoperative outcomes between peritoneal closure and non-closure techniques in patients undergoing open appendicectomy. This prospective comparative study was conducted at Mymensingh Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh, from July 2021 to June 2022, including 80 patients undergoing open appendicectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Patients were divided into Group I (peritoneal closure) and Group II (peritoneal non-closure).Data were processed and analyzed using the computer software SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 26.0 for Windows). The probability value, p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. There was no significant difference in age, sex, BMI, or comorbidities between the groups. Most procedures used a Grid Iron incision (67.5%). Wound infection (22.5%, 17.5% respectively) and wound dehiscence (7.5%, 2.5% respectively) rates were almost similar, with no significant differences (p=0.576 and p=0.305, respectively). However, Group II had significantly lower postoperative wound pain (p<0.001), reduced analgesic requirements (p<0.001) and shorter surgery duration (p<0.001) compared to Group I, demonstrating the potential benefits of omitting peritoneal closure in appendicectomy. It is concluded that non-closure of the peritoneum at open appendicectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis appears to have no adverse effect on post-operative recovery and outcome. Leaving the peritoneum open seems to reduce the operating time and shorter hospital stays. It also decreases post-operative pain with less analgesic requirement. Hence, the practice of non-closure of peritoneum in open appendicectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis can be done safely.

PubMedVol. 34(3)
Mymensingh Medical College Hospital (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.