Geopolitical competition or a conflict of values?A comparison between the US, EU and Russian strategic narratives on the Ukraine war (2022-2023)

The beginning of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 reignited the study of strategic narratives employed by the main actors involved in the conflict. This article focuses on a three-way comparison between the strategic narratives employed to justify action in Ukraine by the European Union, the United States and the Russian Federation. It argues that, consistent with previous findings, the US and EU conceptualize the conflict as one between systems of government and values while Russia describes it as a geopolitical competition for power, disguised as a conflict of values. While the former focus on liberal values and the rules-based order, the latter emphasizes state sovereignty and multipolarity as the correct situation to be maintained. While expected, an increase of the value-based narratives in Russian discourse was not identified. However, when adopting value-based narratives, Russia focused on the traditional family and maintaining natural hierarchies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eastern Journal of European Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47743/ejes-2025-0107
Primary Topic
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geopolitical competition or a conflict of values?A comparison between the US, EU and Russian strategic narratives on the Ukraine war (2022-2023)

Valentin Stoian
Eastern Journal of European Studies
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
article

Geopolitical competition or a conflict of values?A comparison between the US, EU and Russian strategic narratives on the Ukraine war (2022-2023)

Valentin Stoian
article en

Abstract

The beginning of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 reignited the study of strategic narratives employed by the main actors involved in the conflict. This article focuses on a three-way comparison between the strategic narratives employed to justify action in Ukraine by the European Union, the United States and the Russian Federation. It argues that, consistent with previous findings, the US and EU conceptualize the conflict as one between systems of government and values while Russia describes it as a geopolitical competition for power, disguised as a conflict of values. While the former focus on liberal values and the rules-based order, the latter emphasizes state sovereignty and multipolarity as the correct situation to be maintained. While expected, an increase of the value-based narratives in Russian discourse was not identified. However, when adopting value-based narratives, Russia focused on the traditional family and maintaining natural hierarchies.

Eastern Journal of European StudiesVol. 16(1)
National Intelligence Academy (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Geopolitical competition or a conflict of values?A comparison between the US, EU and Russian strategic narratives on the Ukraine war (2022-2023) — Valentin Stoian · Eastern Journal of European Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS