10 years of cooperation on the Thematic Smart Specialisation Platforms.Could macro-regional strategies foster S3-related interregional cooperation?

The article analyses the extent to which the specific policy measures introduced in the 2021-2027 programming period have had an impact on the problems associated with interregional cooperation around smart specialisation priorities on the Thematic Smart Specialisation Platforms (TSSPs). The improvements are considerable, but some weaknesses persist. Lagging regions are more engaged on the platforms and quadruple helix stakeholders, including businesses and business support organisations, are currently involved in partnerships. However, lagging regions are still in minority on the platforms and many of them remain outside. Partnerships do not manage to use the funding available from EU level instruments and from Cohesion Policy in complementarity. The Interreg programmes are an exception. The interregional cooperation linked to smart specialisation should be further improved. Macro-regional strategies could not only offer a space for the alignment of regional research and innovation policies and support S3-related interregional collaboration but could also benefit from these.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eastern Journal of European Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47743/ejes-2025-0112
Primary Topic
Regional Development and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

10 years of cooperation on the Thematic Smart Specialisation Platforms.Could macro-regional strategies foster S3-related interregional cooperation?

Petra Szávics
1 links
Eastern Journal of European Studies
Regional Development and Policy
article

10 years of cooperation on the Thematic Smart Specialisation Platforms.Could macro-regional strategies foster S3-related interregional cooperation?

Petra Szávics
article en

Abstract

The article analyses the extent to which the specific policy measures introduced in the 2021-2027 programming period have had an impact on the problems associated with interregional cooperation around smart specialisation priorities on the Thematic Smart Specialisation Platforms (TSSPs). The improvements are considerable, but some weaknesses persist. Lagging regions are more engaged on the platforms and quadruple helix stakeholders, including businesses and business support organisations, are currently involved in partnerships. However, lagging regions are still in minority on the platforms and many of them remain outside. Partnerships do not manage to use the funding available from EU level instruments and from Cohesion Policy in complementarity. The Interreg programmes are an exception. The interregional cooperation linked to smart specialisation should be further improved. Macro-regional strategies could not only offer a space for the alignment of regional research and innovation policies and support S3-related interregional collaboration but could also benefit from these.

Eastern Journal of European StudiesVol. 16(1)
Babeș-Bolyai University (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Regional Development and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

10 years of cooperation on the Thematic Smart Specialisation Platforms.Could macro-regional strategies foster S3-related interregional cooperation? — Petra Szávics · Eastern Journal of European Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS