THE INFLUENCE OF WEIGHT-BEARING AND FLEXION ON 3D JOINT SPACE WIDTH IN KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS

In knee OA, radiographic JSW is used as a surrogate for MRI-measured cartilage thickness, though they often do not correlate well. Variations in positioning between radiography (weight-bearing semi-flexion) and MRI (non-weight-bearing extension) may contribute to discrepancies. This study aimed to evaluate differences in 3D JSW and cartilage thickness distribution between these positions in knee OA patients. 21 symptomatic knee OA patients (KLG 2/3) were included. Exclusion criteria included prior knee surgery, MRI ineligibility, inability to stand unassisted for 15 minutes, or knee width > 15 cm (knee coil limit). A knee MRI protocol was performed using a 0.25T weight-bearing MRI system (G-scan Brio, Esaote). A coronal 3D dual-echo SSFP sequence (SHARC) was acquired to obtain images with an isotropic resolution of 0.66mm in both extended and flexed knee positions under weight-bearing conditions by rotating the system to 81°. Both scans were repeated under non-weight-bearing conditions by rotating the system to a horizontal position (0°). Knee flexion angles were measured, and the femur and tibia bones were segmented in 3D Slicer. 3D models were exported to Stradview to measure the tibia-femur distance at each vertex as a measure of JSW. The models and data were registered to canonical surfaces in wxRegSurf and further analyzed in MATLAB using the Surfstat package for statistical parametric mapping to derive p-values corrected for multiple vertex-wise comparisons. The average knee angles of the 21 patients were 7.4±3.7° (extended) and 19.1±5.5° (flexed). The average JSW ranged from 3.1 mm to 14.7 mm across patients (Figure 1). A significantly smaller JSW for weight-bearing vs non-weight-bearing conditions, particularly in the outer medial and posterior lateral tibia for extended positions, and in the posterior medial tibia for flexed positions, was seen (Figure 2). Flexion increased the JSW in the anterior tibia and decreased it in the posterior tibia, particularly laterally in weight-bearing positions. JSW distribution in knee OA patients varies significantly depending on both weight-bearing and knee flexion angle, and radiographic JSW measurements may not accurately reflect the joint space in non-weight-bearing positions, such as those used in MRI, especially in the lateral compartment. Currently ongoing cartilage analyses will indicate to which extent these JSW variations are attributable to changes in cartilage thickness or meniscal positioning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Osteoarthritis Imaging
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ostima.2025.100320
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE INFLUENCE OF WEIGHT-BEARING AND FLEXION ON 3D JOINT SPACE WIDTH IN KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS

S.C. Mastbergen, M.P. Jansen, Tom Turmezei, W.M. van den Brink et al.
Osteoarthritis Imaging
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

THE INFLUENCE OF WEIGHT-BEARING AND FLEXION ON 3D JOINT SPACE WIDTH IN KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS

S.C. Mastbergen, M.P. Jansen, Tom Turmezei, W.M. van den Brink, Frank F.J. Simonis, Wiebe C. Verra, Femke F. Schröder
article en

Abstract

In knee OA, radiographic JSW is used as a surrogate for MRI-measured cartilage thickness, though they often do not correlate well. Variations in positioning between radiography (weight-bearing semi-flexion) and MRI (non-weight-bearing extension) may contribute to discrepancies. This study aimed to evaluate differences in 3D JSW and cartilage thickness distribution between these positions in knee OA patients. 21 symptomatic knee OA patients (KLG 2/3) were included. Exclusion criteria included prior knee surgery, MRI ineligibility, inability to stand unassisted for 15 minutes, or knee width > 15 cm (knee coil limit). A knee MRI protocol was performed using a 0.25T weight-bearing MRI system (G-scan Brio, Esaote). A coronal 3D dual-echo SSFP sequence (SHARC) was acquired to obtain images with an isotropic resolution of 0.66mm in both extended and flexed knee positions under weight-bearing conditions by rotating the system to 81°. Both scans were repeated under non-weight-bearing conditions by rotating the system to a horizontal position (0°). Knee flexion angles were measured, and the femur and tibia bones were segmented in 3D Slicer. 3D models were exported to Stradview to measure the tibia-femur distance at each vertex as a measure of JSW. The models and data were registered to canonical surfaces in wxRegSurf and further analyzed in MATLAB using the Surfstat package for statistical parametric mapping to derive p-values corrected for multiple vertex-wise comparisons. The average knee angles of the 21 patients were 7.4±3.7° (extended) and 19.1±5.5° (flexed). The average JSW ranged from 3.1 mm to 14.7 mm across patients (Figure 1). A significantly smaller JSW for weight-bearing vs non-weight-bearing conditions, particularly in the outer medial and posterior lateral tibia for extended positions, and in the posterior medial tibia for flexed positions, was seen (Figure 2). Flexion increased the JSW in the anterior tibia and decreased it in the posterior tibia, particularly laterally in weight-bearing positions. JSW distribution in knee OA patients varies significantly depending on both weight-bearing and knee flexion angle, and radiographic JSW measurements may not accurately reflect the joint space in non-weight-bearing positions, such as those used in MRI, especially in the lateral compartment. Currently ongoing cartilage analyses will indicate to which extent these JSW variations are attributable to changes in cartilage thickness or meniscal positioning.

Osteoarthritis ImagingVol. 5
University of East Anglia (GB), Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (GB), Medisch Spectrum Twente (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), University of Twente (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.