Amateur photography in 1920s Leningrad: institutional practices and visual strategies in the context of Soviet cultural policy

The aim of this study is to examine the development of the amateur photography movement in Leningrad during the 1920s within the context of Soviet cultural policy, based on archival materials from the Central State Archive of Literature and Art of St. Petersburg, periodicals of the 1920s, and relevant regulatory documents. The research established that despite efforts to create a mass movement, amateur photography remained limited in scope due to a weak material base and formalism in the work of public organizations, and the emerging visual canon of mass photography had not gained widespread popularity by the late 1920s. The scientific novelty lies in the comprehensive analysis of institutional strategies, the social composition of participants, and the formation of the visual canon of the early Soviet amateur photography movement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Manuscript
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30853/mns20250115
Primary Topic
Visual Culture and Art Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Amateur photography in 1920s Leningrad: institutional practices and visual strategies in the context of Soviet cultural policy

Gleb Denisovich Vorotyntsev
Manuscript
Visual Culture and Art Theory
article

Amateur photography in 1920s Leningrad: institutional practices and visual strategies in the context of Soviet cultural policy

Gleb Denisovich Vorotyntsev
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the development of the amateur photography movement in Leningrad during the 1920s within the context of Soviet cultural policy, based on archival materials from the Central State Archive of Literature and Art of St. Petersburg, periodicals of the 1920s, and relevant regulatory documents. The research established that despite efforts to create a mass movement, amateur photography remained limited in scope due to a weak material base and formalism in the work of public organizations, and the emerging visual canon of mass photography had not gained widespread popularity by the late 1920s. The scientific novelty lies in the comprehensive analysis of institutional strategies, the social composition of participants, and the formation of the visual canon of the early Soviet amateur photography movement.

ManuscriptVol. 18(3)
St Petersburg University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Visual Culture and Art Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Amateur photography in 1920s Leningrad: institutional practices and visual strategies in the context of Soviet cultural policy — Gleb Denisovich Vorotyntsev · Manuscript (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS