The Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) in Treatment of Sepsis and Septic Shock

Context: There are conflicting results in the literature regarding the effect of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) on the outcomes of sepsis and septic shock patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU). Objectives: The present meta-analysis aims to investigate the efficacy of G-CSF in the treatment of sepsis and septic shock. Methods: Studies were selected using a systematic search in the EMBASE and PubMed databases, conducted in September 2024 over one month. Studies from 1996 to 2023 were selected based on inclusion criteria. Outcomes included mortality rate, APACHE II scores, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores, and ICU stay length. Exclusion criteria included pediatric and prophylactic studies. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager V.5.1 software. Results: Fourteen randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies were selected based on the inclusion criteria. The results of this meta-analysis indicated no significant effect of G-CSF administration on mortality rate [0.62 (1.14 - 0.34), Z = 1.53, P = 0.130], SOFA scores [-0.64 (-1.09 - 1.09), Z = 1.48, P = 0.14], and ICU stay length [-3.46 (-40.79 - 40.79), Z = 0.42, P = 0.68]. However, G-CSF administration was associated with a significant decrease in APACHE II scores [-2.25 [-4.36 - (-0.14)], Z = 2.09, P = 0.04]. Conclusions: It was concluded that the administration of G-CSF as an adjunctive treatment to patients with sepsis and septic shock does not affect mortality rate, dysfunction of vital organs, or the length of stay in the ICU.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comprehensive Health and Biomedical Studies
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5812/chbs-161333
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) in Treatment of Sepsis and Septic Shock

Mojtaba Mojtahedzadeh, Aliasghar Tabatabaei Mohammadi, Kiumarth Amini, Mohamad Rahman Najmeddin
1 citations
Comprehensive Health and Biomedical Studies
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
0.39
article

The Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) in Treatment of Sepsis and Septic Shock

Mojtaba Mojtahedzadeh, Aliasghar Tabatabaei Mohammadi, Kiumarth Amini, Mohamad Rahman Najmeddin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Context: There are conflicting results in the literature regarding the effect of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) on the outcomes of sepsis and septic shock patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU). Objectives: The present meta-analysis aims to investigate the efficacy of G-CSF in the treatment of sepsis and septic shock. Methods: Studies were selected using a systematic search in the EMBASE and PubMed databases, conducted in September 2024 over one month. Studies from 1996 to 2023 were selected based on inclusion criteria. Outcomes included mortality rate, APACHE II scores, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores, and ICU stay length. Exclusion criteria included pediatric and prophylactic studies. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager V.5.1 software. Results: Fourteen randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies were selected based on the inclusion criteria. The results of this meta-analysis indicated no significant effect of G-CSF administration on mortality rate [0.62 (1.14 - 0.34), Z = 1.53, P = 0.130], SOFA scores [-0.64 (-1.09 - 1.09), Z = 1.48, P = 0.14], and ICU stay length [-3.46 (-40.79 - 40.79), Z = 0.42, P = 0.68]. However, G-CSF administration was associated with a significant decrease in APACHE II scores [-2.25 [-4.36 - (-0.14)], Z = 2.09, P = 0.04]. Conclusions: It was concluded that the administration of G-CSF as an adjunctive treatment to patients with sepsis and septic shock does not affect mortality rate, dysfunction of vital organs, or the length of stay in the ICU.

Comprehensive Health and Biomedical StudiesVol. 3(2)
Hamedan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Zanjan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Urmia University (IR), Urmia University of Medical Sciences (IR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
0.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.